| 
 Hi Herman, 
  
I have the same basic experience with stop. 
Invariably they diminish the system. 
  
Am intrigued with your profit stops.  
  
How do you determine a profit stop ... Support 
resistance levels, fibs??? 
  
Have a great day 
  
Ara 
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 4:56 
  AM 
  Subject: RE: [amibroker] Short system 
  advice? 
  
  
  Hi 
  Chris, 
    
  Yes 
  i like to develop short term systems: the shorter the better, usually 
  1-10 minute trades. imo, The significance of a signal fades quickly.  And 
  yes, I meant ApplyStop() type stops where you set the position to close 
  at a given % trade DD. Invariably maxloss stops make me "lock in Losses" 
  and the price goes my way after I close the position. I don't use 
  complicated stops and perhaps that is the problem. I find it better to develop 
  system without and kind of profit/loss stops, just the basic system working on 
  signals only. Almost always after i have that working adding profit stops will 
  increase profits and adding Max Loss stops decrease 
  profits. 
    
  best 
  regards, 
  herman 
    
    
  
    Herman
  Could I trouble you to expand on 
    that briefly?:
  by "max stop loss" I presume you mean an initial 
    capital protection as per Applystop(stoptypeloss,...,......) or 
    similar.
  or do you mean trailing stops as in 
     Applystop(stoptypetrailing,..., ..., ... ?
  I appreciate your 
    systems may be shorter term, rather than longer.
  Only ask because 
    this w/e I have been reviewing all my trades since Jan 2004 (ASX markets, 
    stocks, long only, trend following) and found that it is my trailing stops 
    (whatever volatility parameter), that curtailed my results, (together with 
    emotions etc but that is another story). I might look at locking in the stop 
    at breakeven, then only trailing when there is a 
    pattern/retracement/consolidation above each successive R-multiple profit 
    level, starting at 3R. This would have served me far better in the trending 
    market we have experienced over the last few years. 
  I am beginning 
    to think that for shorter term systems, initial Capital protection stops may 
    prematurely halt the cyclical nature of whatever is causing the system to 
    work, but need to get to grips with more coding and backtesting skills to 
    confim this.
  Your comments would be most 
    appreciated.
  ChrisB
 
 
  Herman van den Bergen 
    <psytek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: 
    
      
      stocks have "character" some work Long and some work short and some 
      work both ways. Same wrt rhythmic and other characteristics...imho there 
      is no reason why we should assume any characteristic to be permanent or 
      common to a large population. 
        
      When designing a system I try to find similar performance for 
      Long and Short, this gives me more confidence that I won't go broke in a 
      strong trend. Systems that only work Long or Short make me nervous as I 
      worry that they will stop working abruptly. Sometimes, most of the time I should say...  it is 
      necessary to adjust parameters individually for long and short. I try 
      to develop systems that give me thousands of trades (minute time 
      frame) and produce a nice smooth surfaces on the 3D charts. I never trust 
      systems that give me more than one significant 
hotspot. 
        
      wrt indicator, I don't use any. I trade only very short term 
      patterns - I am a skeptic on the use of traditional indicators. Never got 
      any to work well - probably because I don't have the patience (or nerve) 
      to sit through long trades and through major DDs. 
        
      tips? don't use any max loss stops, imho they kill systems. Use 
      profit stops instead. Design both Entries and exits individually, only 
      rarely will an entry rule give same performance as an exit rule. The 
      exception to this may be high speed automated reversal trading 
      systems (50-100 trades a day) that are in the market full 
      time 
        
      jmo... from a developer's viewpoint, I enjoy development more than 
      trading :-) 
        
      herman  
      
        I have some 
        nice, well-tested long systems in place. I was surprised  when 
        testing my discretionary systems, to find that none of my short 
         signals performed nearly as well as the long signals, in the 
         optimization/backtest/monte carlo simulations.
  Is this 
        common?
  In addition, I am looking for some ideas around what 
        indicators to use  as the foundation for building an adequate short 
        system. Any ideas? I  did some searches on previous messages here, 
        and did not find anything  of value. General rules of thumb, and bits 
        of experiential wisdom, are  also welcome -- as they apply to short 
        systems.
  Thanks in 
      advance,
  Brian
 
 
 
  
  
    
      
    Yahoo! Mail Use 
    Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.   
  
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. 
 
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to  
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com 
 
For other support material please check also: 
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html 
 
  
    
  
  
  
    SPONSORED LINKS
   
       
  
 
  
    
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
 
 
    
 |