[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Sierra charts vs. Amibroker on IB backfills



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

OK, on futher evaluation, on sierra charts I have the back fill set 
for maximum 5 day backfill, it goes and gets the data in increments 
of 30 sec's, then reverts to second based data as it gets new data 
from the API.  This method, I find far superior.  It allows enough 
data to see what happened on prior days, sets up my indicators so 
that I can intraday trade, and reverts to the fastest level for 
actual trading.

Thomas, please consider the above approach as a plugin option, to 
allow full 5-day backfill (at less resolution) when using tick or 
second based database.  A possibility could be to allow the 5-day 
backfill at 30sec or 1m, then refill at the 5 sec, then at the 1sec 
or tick level, to get the most and best data based on what the user 
has set in their database.  True, this would be a slower backfill 
option, and plenty are whining about backfill speeds, but without 
24h backfill minimum, I can't use Amibroker as an intraday trading 
platform.

Thx,

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "bj012859" <byronjames@xxxx> wrote:
>
> Hope I'm doing something wrong because I would rather use 
amibroker 
> because of the ease in programming; but, I am not getting even 
close 
> to the same backfills between the two products (using same 
computer 
> and same IB API.  I read a message that stated that if you set the 
> database to ticks then u will only get 1000 bars of data under 
> amibroker.  That's what it appears i'm getting with AB 4.73beta 
and 
> 1.43 plugin.  Sierra chart is giving me 5 full days worth of 
second-
> based data somehow (their sw is set up to provide 120 days, but 5 
> day limitation is with IB).  
> 
> I use 250, 600 & 3000 volume charts for trading, hence second or 
> tick based feed is critical.  I like the way amibroker displays 
the 
> volume charts, much better than sierra, but can't get by with the 
> extremely limited backfill provided through amibroker.
> 
> The packages use the same IB API.  I just don't get it.  If there 
> are any other sierra chart users here, please help Thomas to 
> understand the difference in backfill methods, so that we can have 
> the same amount of backfill data as sierra users.
> 
> Thx,
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Try Online Currency Trading with GFT. Free 50K Demo. Trade 
24 Hours. Commission-Free. 
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RvFikB/9M2KAA/U1CZAA/GHeqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    amibroker-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/