|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
FWIW...
I filed as a trader for several years and was audited 3 different
times. The IRS hates sch Cs that show all expenses and no
income. :(
Net score me 2, IRS 1, for a couple hundred dollars.
I keep every individual tax lot in Quicken with integrated downloads from
several brokers and some lots entered manually. I use Tax Cut for
Fed and State taxes. I also never found a CPA that was worth a
damn.
With that as background, here is what I do: I never fill out the
sch D forms for individual trades, all I enter is two summary lines with
total buys, total sales, net profit/loss for LT and ST and a note that
details are available on request. The IRS never had a problem with
that. They have all the trade info from my brokers anyway, and if
there was a question on any individual trade I would just supply
documentation for that. They will want copies of the confirmations
in that case so the individual entries on the sch D are not used
anyway.
I have found if you keep complete records, treat it like a real
business and don't try to cheat, there is quite a bit of flexibility on
the part of the IRS when it comes to presentation on the tax
forms.
Still audits are a real PITA because of the time and effort involved
coming up with the documentation especially if you end up with a poorly
qualified examiner that is just trying to get through his day and wants
to cover his butt by appearing to be thorough.
Cheers
Sid
At 09:58 PM 6/27/2005, you wrote:
Hi Steve,
The short answer: AFAIK, the IRS doesn't require you to list trades by
brokerage, just the list the individual trades with purchase amount
(basis) and sale price to show profit (loss) plus holding period and the
total proceeds on the Sch D. The Sch D is supposed to match the
total from all Sch D-1s and the 1099s provided by your brokerage.
That said, here's what I have been doing for many years.
The longer answer: Years ago I built my own Excel spreadsheet for
tracking trades, partly to stay on top of quarterly estimated tax
payments and for Sch D purposes and partly to monitor my trading
(win-loss ratios, profitability, ROI, trade duration, that sort of
thing). The spread sheet has separate sheets for each account and a
summary collection sheet with linked cells for the gross and net figures
from each brokerage by quarter and end of year. So in many ways, it
functions like (what I understand) Gainskeeper does, just I have more
manual data entry (well, actually download and paste from the
brokerages), but more flexibility and info for my use.
But when I file, I reflect the summary totals of all accounts on the Sch
D, and complete as many Sch D-1 pages (I have used Turbo tax to generate
these) as necessary to list all my trades chronologically without regard
to what brokerage account they came from. Because I generally have
short positions held at year end (and I've not elected MTM status), I
always attach an explanation as to why the brokerage 1099 totals do not
match the total I am reporting (which is less). I note that I have
multiple brokerage accounts and multiple 1099s, that the figures on the
Sch D are the totals for all brokerage activity less the hold over short
sales which have not realized a gain or loss as of the end of the tax
year and I detail (format like a Sch D-1) the short positions that are
open to show that if their "sales" were added to my Sch D
figures, the brokerage 1099's and this figure would be in
agreement. This letter also accounts for any other matters that I
think might raise a question and notes what happened (e.g., multiple wash
sales in one security, long term sales from any of the investment
accounts in a security I also traded, etc.). I used to provide the
spreadsheet with my tax return as well, but for the past 4 or 5 years
I've simply stated in the letter that I also have an accounting for all
trades by brokerage, as well as confirm slips/monthly statements should
they be needed for review. I've never been asked for them (nor
audited for that matter - knock on wood), but then that may be a function
of the number of Sch D-1 pages I submit and the detail included in the
rest of my return on several Sch Cs (other businesses) and E's
(partnerships, rental properties) 2 Sch Fs (farming income) and other
activities convinces whomever that I can back up what I report. In
any event, I don't try to push the tax envelope either, I could probably
deduct more items here and there, but every thing is easily proven and I
always keep an envelope of "Oh what about these?" things each
year in case I ever do get audited. I have heard of folks who say
they just provide the spreadsheet and the summary on the Sch D, but what
I've done seems to work and why mess with something if it ain't
broke.
And yes, I do my own returns (I haven't found a CPA that adequately
understood all the facets of my activities). Suffice to say as
well, I don't try to file electronically. And for anyone reading,
this isn't tax advice, get your own lawyer, CPA or do your own research
-- you're on your own.
Peace and Justice --- Patrick
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Steve Dugas
- To:
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 4:17 PM
- Subject: Re: [amibroker] TC2000/TCNet/TC2005 and QP
- Hi Patrick - a quick question if I
may:
-
- How do you reconcile Schedule D's when you
have multiple brokers? I have multiple accounts this year for the first
time. Both offer Gainskeeper ( free online version I guess ), but I am
wondering what is the best way to combine them into one Sched D. Thanks
very much!
-
- Steve
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: NW Trader
- To:
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 2:00 AM
- Subject: Re: [amibroker] TC2000/TCNet/TC2005 and QP
- Hi Bob,
-
- It's been a while since we've exchanged many thoughts, I hope you are
well. What keeps you going back to QP?
-
- Actually I've had both for years, along with multiple RT feeds as
well. I'm sort of a belt and suspenders trader - most everything is
backed up or has an alternative (computers, data feeds, brokerages,
broadband and ISPs, even power with a generator system as I live in the
country). IMHO, they complement each other -- each with different
strengths and weaknesses. I'll try to summarize both.
-
- The Pros:
-
- QP has more fundamental fields exposed to AB in their API -- I
particularly like having float info (I still use a variant of the Rich
E's old PTATR for one exploration). And at least until recently (I
mark it more or less with Janene's departure), the stock data had fewer
errors and when it did was corrected quicker. Originally it ran
much faster in AB and as I first started with it, I had a predisposition
for it's scanning capability. If you use mutuals (I don't for timing or
otherwise), they are included with in a subscription.
-
- TC has intraday updates (I run several boxes while trading) albeit
delayed, so I if I wish, I can then quickly run AB AAs on an entire
database, not the several hundred at a time from eSignal. And they
have their media general groups (like the industry monitors in QP), but
listed within the sector so relative strength comparisons are much easier
than building and maintaining composites.
-
- The Cons:
-
- The QP data base (as I seem to recall you also complaining) is far
from clean -- I update my AB databases from the external ones each
weekend and then clean up inactive tickers -- QP generally has hundreds
whereas TC has a dozen or so. I've spoken often to tech support at
QP about this, and the are always "surprised" by the number
(I've sent them lists) and promise to look into it, but nothing changes
and a new disk (with a current database) doesn't change the bad
tickers. [In fact I spoke to them today again.] And
while I don't use mutuals funds, I understand that they often fail to
account for distributions and dividends promptly.
-
- When there is a data problem with TC, they can take weeks to correct
it. The program itself is something of a kludge of you are into
writing your own indicators, and of course you have to deal with the
idiosyncrasies of the Wordens (like, no ADX until just recently because
they didn't think it had merit, still no CCI, ATR, etc.). True,
with the most recent versions your can write your own custom indicators,
but ADX is not one of them and ATR is impossibly long (over 30 steps for
an ATR(10) ). And while there is some additional fundamental info
in their database, it isn't available via the API. Mutual funds are
an added subscription cost.
-
- The upshot:
-
- I'm in my 5th year with AB and long ago came to regard both TC and QP
as merely end of day data feeds for AB. If I could find another
data vendor that had the strengths of each, and perhaps not the
weaknesses, I'd switch and probably quit. I run my end of day
scans/exploration for watchlists on these databases (also verify data
integrity between the two), but for trading I'm watching the RT data
feeds - eSig, QuoteTracker fed by Prophet Finance, PCQuote, and brokerage
streamers. I had IQ feed for a while but found it was too dirty and
erratic. With the merger of Waterhouse and Ameritrade, I'll
probably close one account and open an IB account (when Ameritrade got
Datek, my account there got big enough and I added eTrade).
With whom are you trading, any thoughts or recommendations?
-
- Best wishes, and good trades.
-
- Peace and Justice --- Patrick
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: Bob Jagow
- To:
amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:41 PM
- Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: New, fixed TC2000/TCNet/TC2005 data
plugin
- I didn’t realize that you
used TC2000x, Patrick.
-
- Since I’ve tried it a few times, but always went back to QPlus, could
you spell out why you picked it, given that you also have a RT feed?
-
- Regards,
- Bob
- Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
- To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
- SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
- For other support material please check also:
-
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
- <?---- LSpots keywords ?><?---- HM ADS ?>
- Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
- To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
- SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
- For other support material please check also:
-
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
- <?---- LSpots keywords ?><?---- HM ADS ?>
Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
<?---- LSpots keywords ?> <?---- HM ADS ?>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.1/28 - Release Date:
6/24/2005
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.1/28 - Release Date: 6/24/2005
|