[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] "Random prices" (was Re: Backtest using equity curve)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  <FONT 
  color=#000000>uenal.mutlu@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href=""><FONT 
  color=#000000>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:01 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] "Random prices" 
  (was Re: Backtest using equity curve)
  
  It is even then not true. Do you really believe that for
  example the price in the range 24 to 26 of the below
  said stock is random? That is: will the price be jumping
  randomly in that area? No, Sir. The price will be "build" and
  it will "move" but not randomly jump. As said: prices are 
  driven only by supply and demand, and not by any random 
  event. Since you seem to believe in randomness in stock 
  prices:  to what degree (%) do you think are price moves 
  random?
   
  If you don't accept the three 
  compenents of a price series, then you reside in a very small minority that 
  dismisses the volumes that have been written about the subject.  As for 
  the %, that is not a constant and will differ for each issue.  Oh, and by 
  the way, do you really believe that supply and demand behavior is independent 
  of trend, cycle, and randomness?  If so, then again you are in a small 
  minority.
   
   
   
  <BLOCKQUOTE 
  >
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    <DIV 
    >From: 
    <FONT 
    color=#000000>wavemechanic 
    To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    href=""><FONT 
    color=#000000>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:40 
    PM
    Subject: Re: [amibroker] "Random 
    prices" (was Re: Backtest using equity curve)
    
     
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>uenal.mutlu@xxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
    size=2>>
    To: <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
    size=2>>
    Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:46 
    AM
    Subject: Re: [amibroker] "Random prices" (was Re: 
    Backtest using equity curve)
    
    > I naturally disagree :-)> So, you and 
    quanttrader are really saying that> the stock prices are indeed 
    really random?!> So, then why use T/A or AB at all?> Why on 
    hell would anybody invest in random things (except in lotto 
    etc.)?
     
    I don't think anyone is saying that a price 
    series is completely random, but rather that a random series can look like a 
    price series.  Any price series is produced by contributions from 
    three sources: trending, cyclical, and random.
    > 
    > Ok, here is a practical example: imagine a stock> closed at 
    25 yesterday. Do you really believe that> the intraday price of this 
    stock today will make> random moves between 0 and say 50 ?> 
    Intraday it will move around 25, but will definitely not make> fe. 
    something like the following: 25, 1, 50, 25, 10, 40, 0, 1, 50> If 
    this practically is not possible with this stock then> it definitely 
    is not random. IMHO a basic fact.> > > > ----- 
    Original Message -----> From: "Tomasz Janeczko" 
    <<FONT 
    color=#000000 size=2>amibroker@xxxxxx<FONT 
    size=2>>> To: <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
    size=2>>> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:49 PM> Subject: 
    Re: [amibroker] "Random prices" (was Re: Backtest using equity 
    curve)> > > > Uenal,> >> > I 
    fully agree with quanttrader.> >> > Even code you 
    supplied can be modified to produce chart that is random too> > 
    but looks much closer to 'real' prices.> >> > Graph = 
    100+ Cum( -1 + Random() * 2.0 );> >> > Plot(Graph, 
    "Random graph", colorBlue);> >> > Best regards,> 
    > Tomasz Janeczko> > amibroker.com> >> > 
    Best regards,> > Tomasz Janeczko> > 
    amibroker.com> > ----- Original Message -----> > From: 
    "quanttrader714" <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>quanttrader714@xxxxxxxxx<FONT 
    size=2>>> > To: <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
    size=2>>> > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 3:39 PM> 
    > Subject: [amibroker] "Random prices" (was Re: Backtest using equity 
    curve)> >> >> > This proves nothing.  
    Your model is flawed.  Generate a chart with one> > 
    dimensional Brownian motion and there's not a person on this board 
    who> > would be able to tell it from a "real" price chart.  
    An omniscient> > being could create perfect deterministic models 
    of the markets but for> > mere mortals, there's significant 
    randomness caused by an incredibly> > complex mix of competing 
    forces that "nudge" prices in different> > directions, from 
    institutional purchases to Johnny Jones cashing in to> > pay for 
    his daughter's wedding to daytraders, etc., etc., etc.> > Certain 
    forces will prevail and/or be in synch to varying degrees over> > 
    time.  But even in a totally random process, anything that can 
    happen,> > will happen if you wait long enough.> 
    >> >> > --- In <A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
    <FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>uenal.mutlu@x... 
    wrote:> > > // generate random series in the range 0 to 100 and 
    plot it> > > Graph = Random() * 100;> > > 
    Plot(Graph, "Random graph", colorBlue);> > >> > > 
    Does any real chart look like such a random chart: NO.> > > 
    This proves the basic fact that nothing in the markets> > > is 
    or was ever random.> > > UM> > >> > 
    >> > >> > > ----- Original Message 
    -----> > > From: "palsanand" <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>palsanand@x...>> 
    > > To: <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
    size=2>>> > > Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 1:19 
    AM> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Backtest using equity 
    curve> > >> > >> > > In his book "The 
    Profit Magic of Stock Transaction Timing", J.M.> > > Hurst 
    proves that market movement is not random, and by analyzing a> > 
    > large "stable" of underlying instruments one could find 
    excellent> > > opportunities for profit each and every 
    day.  The movement is not> > > random but non-stationary 
    because markets do not move without a> > > purpose or a goal, 
    they move because of an imbalance between supply> > > (sellers) 
    and demand (buyers) with the price tending to equalize it.> > > 
    However the outcomes are random, i.e, unknown and the probability of> 
    > > winning is undetermined, i.e., not a constant.> > 
    >> > > Identifying persistent price patterns helps one to 
    determine the> > > dependance of the outcomes.  The 
    existence of a pullback or a rally> > > situation is dependant 
    on the existance of a previous uptrend or a> > > downtrend and 
    so is the existance of a trend reversal.  What's real> > > 
    price movement in response to a clear signal and what's just random> 
    > > noise? Figuring out the difference is vital and according to John 
    F.> > > Ehlers in a recent article in S & C Magazine such a 
    distinction can> > > be important to trading. If one could 
    avoid periods when the market> > > has no clear trend (just 
    enjoy being flat), one could avoid whipsaws> > > and get 
    cleaner trades. If one could identify periods that were> > > 
    filled with noise and no clear signals in either direction, one> > 
    could> > > also switch trading tactics to suit the situation, 
    for e.g., day-> > > trading instead of position-trading. At the 
    very least, one would> > > know what situation one 
    faces.> > >> > > rgds, Pal> > > --- 
    In <FONT 
    color=#000000 
    size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
    "quanttrader714"> > > <<A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>quanttrader714@x...> 
    wrote:> > > > You guys are confusing randomness, 
    independence and stationarity> > > big time.> > > 
    >> > > > --- In <A 
    href=""><FONT color=#000000 
    size=2>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
    "Dave Merrill" <<FONT 
    color=#000000 size=2>dmerrill@x<FONT 
    size=2>...>> > > wrote:> > > > > agreed. 
    if the fact that a trading system did well in the past> > > has 
    no> > > > > bearing whatsoever on whether it does well in 
    the future, how> > can> > > we> > > > 
    know> > > > > anything at all about the future 
    performance of a proposed> > trading> > > > 
    system?> > > > >> > > > > dave> 
    > > > >> > > > >   The gambler¡Çs 
    fallacy is a fallacy because the gambler> > ignores> > 
    > the> > > > > independence of the outcomes and looks 
    for patterns that do not> > > > exist.  If> > 
    > > > we have designed trading systems based on recognition 
    of> > patterns> > > that> > > > > 
    precede profitable trading opportunities, and if those patterns> > 
    > are> > > > > persistent, then we no longer have 
    random, independent outcomes.> > > Our> > > > 
    > trading systems do have serial dependencies and upward sloping> 
    > > equity> > > > > curves.  So analysis of 
    the equity curve provides an indication> > > of the> 
    > > > > health of the trading system.> > > > 
    >> > > > >> > > > >> > 
    > > >   HowardSend 
  BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
  suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
  href=""><FONT 
  color=#000000>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href=""><FONT 
  color=#000000>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of 
  Service. 






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.