[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Inspection Points vs Continuous Inspection



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Inspection Points decide every, say, 100 bars the optimal 
solution for the next 100 bars.
We may apply Continuous Inspection and change the optimals 
according to the stock [market] performance.
Is it better ?
The question is not simple, we should examine  the 
situation carefully.
An o/b, o/s stochastic system was used as example.The BuyLevel 
was from 20 to 50 and the SellLevel from 60 to 90.
Settings:Buy,Sell at +1Open, commission 0.25%, all stops 
disabled, initial equity 10,000, from Jan3, 2000 till Nov14, 2003.
In AA window paste the
 
// Inspection Points vs Continuous 
Inspection
// A. Inspection 
PointsSTART=DateNum()==1000530 
;EVENT=BarsSince(START)%100==0;k0=20;s0=60;shape=33+2*(Cum(event)%10);PlotShapes(shape*EVENT,colorBlack);Plot(0,"",1,1);Plot(100,"",1,1);G=0; for(K=k0;K<=50;K=K+5){for(s=s0;s<=90;s=s+5){Buy=Cross(StochD(),K);Sell=Cross(S,StochD());E1=Equity(1,0);E11=ValueWhen(EVENT,E1);G=IIf(G>E11,G,E11);}}Kpass=0;Spass=0;for(K=k0;K<=50;K=K+5){for(s=s0;s<=90;s=s+5){Buy=Cross(StochD(),K);Sell=Cross(S,StochD());E1=Equity(1,0);E11=ValueWhen(EVENT,E1);K1=IIf(E11==G,K,0);Kpass=Kpass+K1;S1=IIf(E11==G,S,0);Spass=Spass+S1;G=IIf(E11==G,0,G);}}Buy=Cross(StochD(),kpass);Sell=Cross(Spass,StochD());eIP=Equity(1,0);// 
B. Continuous 
InspectionG=0;Kpass=0;Spass=0;k0=20;s0=60;for(K=k0;K<=50;K=K+5){for(s=s0;s<=90;s=s+5){Buy=Cross(StochD(),K);Sell=Cross(S,StochD());E1=Equity(1,0);G=IIf(G>E1,G,E1);}}for(K=k0;K<=50;K=K+5){for(s=s0;s<=90;s=s+5){Buy=Cross(StochD(),K);Sell=Cross(S,StochD());E1=Equity(1,0);K1=IIf(G==E1,K,0);Kpass=Kpass+K1;S1=IIf(G==E1,S,0);Spass=Spass+S1;G=IIf(E1==G,0,G);}}Buy=Cross(StochD(),kpass);Sell=Cross(Spass,StochD());eCont=Equity(1,0);Filter=eCont>eIP;AddColumn(eCont,"eCont");AddColumn(eIP,"eIP");
 
Explore the N100 database for the n=1 last quotations, for 
various Filter conditions
Some interesting results
Filter=eIP>10000 AND eCont>eIP; 
13stocks/101Filter=eIP>10000 AND eCont<eIP; 
26stocks/101Filter=eCont>eIP;                             
39stocks/101 
The Continuous Inspection did not improve the IP performance for the tested 
system. 
Dimitris Tsokakis






Yahoo! Groups Sponsor












Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.