[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: solving the prediction problem



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Pal,

With all due respect, with your universal prediction technique that 
works on any market, and produces 50%+ returns in a matter of 4 days, 
exactly what is left for you to learn? And with all due respect to 
others, I seriously doubt anyone here can teach you how to top that.

I personally don't mind agressive debates, etc., but statements like 
that (about the predictions, returns, etc.) AND your still being here 
arguing with us (mere mortals) just doesn't fit in my narrow-minded 
notion of the world, and IMHO also unnecessarily reduces the 
credibility of other, perhaps valid, arguments that you make. That's 
just me; you and anyone else is free to disagree with that.

Jitu

PS: Gary, glad to know you're from Texas. I'm in Austin. Like they 
say, I wasn't born in Texas, but I got here as fast as I could. :-)

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "palsanand" <palsanand@xxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for the advise.  I will take it easy.  The only thing I 
argue 
> about is how the job should be done, in this case trading.  Nothing 
> wrong with that.  That is the only way for one to know what is the 
> best way to do the job.  You may consider me unusually intense in 
> whatever I do.  That is my nature.  One should try to learn as much 
> as possible from others, no matter the source.  If I had not 
argued,  
> others may not have intervened and I may not have learned much.  If 
I 
> think I cannot learn from that person, I do not respond.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pal
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gary A. Serkhoshian" 
> <serkhoshian777@xxxx> wrote:
> > Hey ya'll, 
> >  
> > Please everybody take it easy.  
> >  
> > Here's a bit of Texas advice for this board and life:  If you 
think 
> someone is behaving like a jackass, just walk away.
> >  
> > Kind Regards,
> > Gary
> > 
> > palsanand <palsanand@xxxx> wrote:
> > Larry Williams has nothing to do with this.  You still haven't 
> > understood what I meant, and I doubt you ever will.  You seem to 
> hold 
> > to forever your moronic impression that statistics can prove 
> > anything.  May be it will prove your ignorance...
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Pal
> > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "MarkF2" <feierstein@xxxx> 
wrote:
> > > I don't have a good grasp of statistics and you do, LOL?  I'll 
> take
> > > that as the ultimate compliment given your moronic comments on 
> Larry
> > > Williams and your equally ignorant misapplication of the 
Central 
> > Limit
> > > Theorem and other statistical topics on this board.  Can't prove
> > > anything in statistics?   Wrong again (as usual)!  There are 
tons 
> of
> > > proofs in statistics.  But that's not what you meant, right?  
You 
> > were
> > > disputing the usefulness of dealing in probabilities as opposed 
to
> > > certainties, weren't you?  Hello, anyone home?  That's what 
> trading 
> > is
> > > all about!  If you want to study a *really* good trader who also
> > > happens to be a mathematician and who BTW, I believe also 
believes
> > > that statistics is the most useful branch of mathematics for 
> > trading,
> > > look into William Eckhardt.
> > > 
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "palsanand" <palsanand@xxxx> 
> > wrote:
> > > > I do not dispute the usefulness of statistics, only in the 
use 
> of
> > > it 
> > > > to prove something, which anybody who has a good grasp of
> > > statistics 
> > > > in this planet knows, which apparently you don't.
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > 
> > > > Pal
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "MarkF2" <feierstein@xxxx> 
> > wrote:
> > > > > What planet are you from?  Statistics *is* a branch of 
applied
> > > > > mathematics and, IMHO, the single most useful for trading.
> > > > > 
> > > > > "Each of us has been doing statistics all his life, in the 
> > sense 
> > > > that
> > > > > each of us has been busily reaching conclusions based on 
> > empirical
> > > > > observations ever since birth." -- William Kruskal 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "palsanand" 
> <palsanand@xxxx> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Like I said earlier, Statistics is meaningless in the 
> context 
> > > > that 
> > > > > > you can come out with statistics to disprove anything.  
> Proof 
> > > > > > requires a law or a theorem.  Only Mathematics can prove 
or
> > > > > disprove 
> > > > > > and that is one reason it is the greatest of all sciences.
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
> > 
> > Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> > Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Check group FAQ at: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> Service. 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/