[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: Optimization -- again



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Feelings and/or anecdotes require no system.

I've seen discretionary traders, trade without much more than this 
and succeed.  I DON'T happen to be one of these.

I made no comment about optimization necessarily being a bad thing, 
only that I have yet to see ANY system based on walk forward 
optimization work in some context similar to what most have suggested 
in this regard, the length of the lookback period not withstanding.

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Dave Merrill" <dmerrill@xxxx> 
wrote:
> not to be flip, but what's the alternative? systems with no 
parameters?
> settings based on gut feelings, anecdotes or logic? whether we do it
> ourselves or our system does it mechanically by itself, isn't that 
how we
> decide what systems and settings are useful?
> 
> re a practical application, I have a framework I've been using to 
work on
> auto-optimization, an evolution of code I posted for this a few 
days ago.
> you can plug pretty much any trading logic into it, and the 
framework will
> automatically choose new settings every bar, for one or two 
parameters so
> far, based on what performed best over a lookback period you 
choose. I'm
> planning to post it, probably to the library so it's more readable 
than what
> happens to text in email, but it needs a little more documentation 
on how to
> set it up. bug reports and suggestions will be most welcome.
> 
> have I found that you can plug pretty much any common indicator 
into it and
> have it magically turn a nice profit? no way, in fact almost 
nothing I've
> tried this way is worth writing home about at all.
> 
> that's why I keep banging on the theory and practice of 
optimization:
> 
>   - why doesn't this work?
> 
>   - if optimizing past returns doesn't produce good performance in 
the
> future, on what basis do we design and choose trading systems and
> parameters?
> 
> dave
> 
>   From: Fred [mailto:fctonetti@x...]
> 
>   Walk forward testing and optimization is a great concept in theory
>   and although I've seen lots of ideas for how to set it up and be 
used
>   over the years, unfortunately I've yet to see anyone demonstrate 
that
>   it actually works over a variety of market conditions.  There are 
I'm
>   sure lots of reasons for this which I won't delve into here but 
the
>   question remains, has anyone actually seen this put into practice
>   where the result has been a viable system to use in mechanical
>   trading ?  If so can you please point at something that could be
>   looked at objectively that doesn't reside in a black box ?


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at MyInks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada.
http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/mOAaAA/3exGAA/qnsNAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/