[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Fw: [amibroker] Re: using %b and Bollinger's Method II



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




typo:
 

...just send an email to <A 
href="">amibroker@(or reply to) an email with your file 
attached...
should have been:
 

...just send an email to <A 
href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
with your file attached. ..
 
----- Original Message ----- 

From: <A 
title=jgibb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx href="">john gibb 

To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: using %b and Bollinger's Method 
II

see below
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  palsanand 
  
  To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:45 
  AM
  Subject: [amibroker] Re: using %b and 
  Bollinger's Method II
  
  Hi,>Does that mean you don't use Volume?I do not 
  use volume at all.  The volume we get from the data providers is 
  crude approximation and they correct this volume the next day because they 
  could not calculate the volume accurately enough in 1 single day, but by 
  the time you get the corrected volume it is too late...  But 
  generally I avoid thinly traded markets...
<BLOCKQUOTE 
><FONT 
  face=Arial color=#008000 size=2>which service do you get initially bad volume 
  data from? 
  >   Good question...have you, by chance, tried using 
  %b on your indicators to determine O/B and O/S levels? (Chapter 21: 
  'Normalizing Indicators' in Bollinger on Bollinger Bands)I do use 
  Stochastics on my indicators, not the normal stochastics that uses high, 
  low etc., but the StochCCI etc.,
   
  This seems a good idea. Have you 
  tried Bollinger's approach of putting Bollinger Bands around inicators and 
  letting upper(lower) band tags indicate overbought(oversold)? The process 
  being:
      
      a) calculate 
  (and plot) the indicator
      b) calculate and 
  plot BBands around it
      c) calculate %b 
  via:
  <FONT face=Arial color=#008000 
  size=2>        (indicator - 
  indicator_lower_band) / (indicator_upper_band - 
  indicator_lower_band)
      d) plot 
  the new %b as a normalized version of the indicator
   
  I am wondering how that compares to 
  'stochasticizing' indicators like I am gueesing you do like the following, 
  where XXX is any 
  indicator:
   
      (XXX_current - 
  XXX_lowest_in_period) / (XXX_highest_in_period - 
  XXX_lowest_in_period)
   
  ?<FONT face=Arial 
  size=2>
  >   Do you lookback a certain number of bars to 
  determine BandWidth extremes or is it on a stock-by-stock basis?It 
  is on a stock-by-stock basis.
<BLOCKQUOTE 
><FONT 
  color=#008000>
  I think Amibroker's 
  Optimization capability will help with this, though I am just starting to use 
  it, so I am not sure if I look first for stocks to optimize or optimize first 
  in order to select stocks.> >   In 
  my view, any indicator which acts just on the "close" price is 
  >   spurious except the Z-scores.  I reverse my 
  opinion on this. RSI and Stochastics do work quite well as Z-Scores on 
  "close" price.  RSI is tricky in that the O/B and O/S levels I use is 
  75 and 30, not 70 and 30.  Stochastics 20/80 and Z-Scores +2/-2, same 
  as 100/0 atleast initially to detect the signal...>   Do 
  you use the same period for your Z-scores as for the BandWidth period and 
  what 'price' do you use? (with %b, i tried both Close and Average Price 
  but didn't see much difference in results)For BandWidth I use just one 
  period namely 20 bars, but lately I found out that 50 is better because of 
  something to do with 50 being a better sample size than 20 to approximate 
  a normal (gaussian) distribution and so I am going to modify it.  
  
   
  I also use ATR(20) for BandWidth calculation 
   
  I am not sure how you use ATR. 
  Isn't BandWidth:
   
      (upper Bollinger 
  Band - lower Bollinger Band) /middle Bollinger Band
   
  ?
  and I am going to change it to ATR(50) also.  For calculating 
  Z-Scores the sample size does not matter, anything from 2 to 50 is 
  ok.>   I did not find %b and BB's Method II useful mainly 
  because I have >   problems with any theory that contradicts 
  the "Contrarian" theory.  >   As they say, practice 
  without theory is impossible, and theory >   without practice 
  is useless....> >   i don't follow...Contrarian theory 
  for me means do the opposite of the majority...This Method II 
  advocates going long when %b is 80 and short when %b is 20 which is just 
  the opposite of what the "Contrarian" theory is advocating.  In fact 
  you should do it at 0/100 as O/S, O/B levels for 
  these...<FONT face=Arial color=#008000 
  size=2>
  I think Bollinger might respond 
  by advocating using %b of price and then, for confirmation, %b of the 
  indicator.
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  <FONT 
  face=Arial size=2>> >   I agree with Bollinger 
  in using the BandWidth to interpret the >   Volatility 
  Breakout and Counter-trend pullback signals.  But >   
  sometimes, the Counter-trend pullback becomes a Breakout and the 
  >   Breakout becomes a Counter-trend pullback.  > 
  >   At least for his Method I (volatility breakout system), 
  he warns of frequent headfakes, where a breakout occurs initially in the 
  direction opposite of that which it eventually takes...is that what 
  you are referring to?No.  When it starts as a Breakout and 
  then the Volatility changes suddenly as if by magic and the Breakout 
  condition is no longer valid and the Counter-trend condition becomes 
  suddenly valid... and vice-versa..  There is a lot of misinformation 
  in his website or else he doesn't know as much as he claims...  He is 
  leading me on a wild-goose chase when the answers are there in simple 
  basic statistics... If you have a good Entry/Exit Trading Signal Detection 
  System as I do, you would easily spot all these contradictions...  I 
  guess it all boils down to how good your signal detection system 
  is....> >   So, I use both stops and 
  >   Limits based on Volatility.  Stops based on 3BSMA in 
  the same old >   counter-trend territory to cut your losses 
  short or to protect >   profits and stops based on Gann's 
  Rule of Eights in the newly >   trending opposite territory 
  to let your profits run.  Limits are >   based on 6 bar 
  Gann Swing points and will vary depending on >   volatility 
  breakout or counter-trend pullback.> >   it would be 
  great to see a chart illustrating what you mean in the last 
  paragraph...I dont how to attach files here.  I would try to send 
  you a screen capture of Gann's ROE and 6 Bar Swing points to your personal 
  e-mail jgibb1@xxxxx but I dont know the rest of the e-mail.
  my pseudo email is: jgibb1 at 
  earthlink dot net
   
  In order to post attachments such 
  as charts, assuming your email program supports attachments, just send an 
  email to amibroker@(or reply to) an email 
  with your file attached. (AFIK, you can't do this thru the Yahoo site when you 
  'post' a message)
   Pal> 
  >   -john> > > > 
  >   --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "john gibb" 
  <jgibb1@xxxx> wrote:>   > Hi 
  sloughbridge,>   > >   > I interpret 
  Method II to be a trend continuation rather than trend 
  >   reversal (end-of-trend) system.>   > 
  >   > I am using SAR for exits and the '%b<20 AND 
  MFI<20' only for new >   sell 
  signals.>   > >   > But, since my 
  results are not that great, I may take his >   suggestion and 
  use Method II merely as a setup for his Squeeze >   (Method 
  I) system. (I also have this thought that %b should be >   
  qualified by the BandWidth; i.e., an %b of 80 when the bands are 
  >   narrow doesn't seem as good a signal as %b of 80 when 
  they are wide)>   > >   > 
  -john>   > >   > PS: for those who 
  don't have his book, here are the three systems >   he 
  presents there:>   > >   > <A 
  href="">http://www.bollingeronbollingerbands.com/methods/main.php>   
  > <A 
  href="">http://www.bollingeronbollingerbands.com/methods/main.php?method=2>   
  > <A 
  href="">http://www.bollingeronbollingerbands.com/methods/main.php?method=3 
  >   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
  >   >   From: sloughbridge >   
  >   To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >   
  >   Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:28 AM>   
  >   Subject: [amibroker] Re: using %b and Bollinger's Method 
  II>   > >   > >   
  >   --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "john gibb" 
  <jgibb1@xxxx> >   wrote:>   
  >   > Hi,>   >   > 
  >   >   > I am using 'regular' %b with Money 
  Flow Index in order to >   >   replicate, with 
  EOD data, Bollinger's Method II (trend >   following) 
  >   >   system from his book Bollinger on 
  Bollinger Bands. (Both %b and >   MFI 
  >   >   have to be above 80 for a buy and below 
  20 for a sell.)>   > >   >   
  > Also, has anyone else used Bollinger's Method II? So far, my 
  >   >   results are mediocre at 
  best.>   > >   >   Well, he 
  also talks about other end-of-trend indicators, and >   
  Method >   >   II followed lots of discussion of 
  topping patterns.  And he >   talked a 
  >   >   lot about Parametric SAR for an exit 
  with Method II.  I think >   that a >   
  >   lot can be lost if no sign of end-of-trend is detected until 
  %>   b<20 >   >   and 
  MFI<20, but it would definitely give a trending stock plenty 
  >   of >   >   room to run 
  :)>   > >   > >   
  > >   > >   
  >         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
  >   
  >               
  ADVERTISEMENT>   
  >              
  >   >        
  >   >        
  >   > >   >   Send BUG 
  REPORTS to bugs@xxxx>   >   Send SUGGESTIONS to 
  suggest@xxxx>   >   
  ----------------------------------------->   >   
  Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  >   >   (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)>   
  >   
  -------------------------------------------->   
  >   Check group FAQ at: >   <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  >   > >   >   Your use of 
  Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of >   
  Service.> > > 
  >         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
  >               
  ADVERTISEMENT>              
  >        
  >        > 
  >   Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx>   Send 
  SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx>   
  ----------------------------------------->   Post 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  >   (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)>   
  -------------------------------------------->   Check group 
  FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  > >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the 
  Yahoo! Terms of Service.Send BUG REPORTS to 
  bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
  suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
  AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
  group FAQ at: <A 
  href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
Send 
BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to 
suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post 
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A 
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check 
group FAQ at: <A 
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.