[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[amibroker] Re: madness (was AmiBroker vs other programs)



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Yuki Taga <yukitaga@xxxx> wrote:
> Hi kk,
> 
> Thursday, July 3, 2003, 3:46:31 PM, you wrote:
> 
> k> Yuki,
> 
> k> Is it the euphoria stage now or just the beginning of a bull ? 
Right here
> k> the KLCI up for more than 18 points which I have not seen that 
for years in
> k> the first half session. But it scares the futures boys - 
extremely volatile.
> 
> You are asking me?  ^_-  Really, I don't know.
> 
> But it doesn't matter what I think.  You are either a technician or 
a
> fundamentalist.  I am a technician.  I will do what the market
> commands me to do, based on price and volume.  When it gets
> absolutely beyond a question nuts, as it was today, I try and stand
> aside a bit (notice I was not successful in that attempt today, but 
I
> took a very short, calculated risk at the end of the day, when a lot
> of other wits were surely somewhat dulled by the shock of what was
> transpiring today).
> 
> A key, I think, is not mistaking just nuts, which is not all that
> uncommon -- in fact it's regular market fare -- with absolutely
> beyond a question nuts, like our 400 point adventure today was.  We
> had a buy-side panic this morning. There is no other way to describe
> it. And after about an hour the people that paid through the nose to
> buy on the open suddenly realized there was almost nobody in line
> behind them, at least not today.  So then we had a sell-side panic.
> If this was a movie theater everyone would have been trampled 
getting
> in, and then trampled again trying to get out.  What a riot.
> 
> That . . . is absolutely nuts.  But . . . I could not have 
guaranteed
> it was absolutely nuts on the open -- just plain-vanilla nuts.  ^_^
> It only became obvious as the day progressed.  But as the morning
> wore on, it was clear this was not a market to participate in on
> either side right now, unless you enjoy sudden stunning intraday
> reversals against whatever position you take.  I did not enter until
> a *lot* of energy had been dissipated.
> 
> I can't say if other markets have gone so nuts yet. I can't say we
> have reached any intermediate limit here either, but the signs today
> were not good. The market hit a very big air pocket today. The
> airliner is still flying, but a lot of drinks were spilled, and the
> passengers have suddenly taken their seats and fastened their belts.
> Many stopped smiling, and others were looking out the windows to see
> if there might be any terrain obstructions nearby. ^^_^^
> 
> In my opinion, the odds of a prolonged vigorous bull market from 
this
> level upwards are not very good right now.  But I have been proven
> wrong many times. 

My opinion is worthless.  
Yuki,
donīt say that again, your opinion [at least for me] is worthy and 
respectable [no matter if we agree or not, of course...]
DT

So I have given up basing
> my investment decisions on my opinions as much as is humanly
> possible. Along this line, I am trying more and more to build an
> impenetrable barrier between myself and the purveyors of market
> opinion -- the so-called experts.
> 
> Think about this . . .
> 
> If all of us had turned off the TV, stopped reading the newspaper,
> the Internet, or any other source of economic news or opinion.  If 
we
> just tuned into our trading screens each day and looked at our 
charts
> that night, all of this from about March 1, where would we be right
> now? My guess is that without *any* external noise, opinions,
> prognostications, headlines -- without ALL of it -- all of us would
> have done much better.
> 
> So don't ask me for my opinion.  ^^_^^  You'll get one, but it will
> be as worthless as anyone else's that you read or listen to.
> 
> And about the difference between a bull and euphoria: It doesn't
> matter.  Euphoria can be just as long, and is certainly just as real
> to the people who are experiencing it.  There is an assumption by 
the
> non-euphoric that the euphoric are suddenly going to snap back to
> sanity, and suddenly see the world the way the non-euphoric sees it.
> These folks holding that assumption are the very same people who
> shorted the Nas at 3000-something . . . on the way up.
> 
> There is only trade management, and money management.  If you have
> those two down, you can participate in all but the absolutely nuts
> markets.
> 
> Yuki


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/