|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I clearly wrote RSI(14) vs. RSI( ATR(3) ).
The difference is the periods input.
-CS
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
>From:
DIMITRIS
TSOKAKIS
To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 5:01
AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 4.31.0
BETA Question
CS,something must be more clear:Do you speak for a
variable period for RSI(periods) or for the RSI of another
function?When we write RSI(12), we mean RSI calculated on Close,
periods=12.An example of variable period should be
likeper=10+cum(1)%10;W=RSI(per);It will not work, since built-in
RSI() does not accept variable period.The second case is to apply the
RSI transformation on another function, say Stochastics.This is
already included through the RSIA(Array,periods) function, but still for a
fixed period.It would be better to be more specific, which improvement do
you ask. DT--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "CS" <csaxe@xxxx>
wrote:> > Since converting some of my systems to dynamic
parameter input, my success (profits) has increased dramatically.>
Unfortunately, most people don't know the difference between dynamic
(variable) and static (constant) parameter inputs.> Simplistic
Hint: Static- RSI(14); Dynamic- RSI(
ATR(3) );> > I have asked TJ to go back and re-work indicators
and functions to accept dynamic inputs, but he said that only three other
people had asked for the same thing, so it is low on his priority list.
So, I have had to resort to manually coding each indicator/function in
script, and script sucks. Error messages while debugging are so vague,
that they are useless.> The recent inclusion of native AFL looping and
flow control will help.> > There are some functions that
accept dynamic input such as HHV, LLV, Sum, Ref, AMA, AMA2, WMA, DEMA,
TEMA and MA.> > It would be nice if all new functions/indicators
created would accept dynamic inputs.> >
-CS> ----- Original Message ----- >
From: Fred > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:26
PM> Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 4.31.0 BETA
Question> > > I believe LinRegSlope takes as
it's second argument a NON time > variant argument or a
constant NOT an array like for example AMA > would. I
don't know but I supect the code I put in my original post
> won't work any way or if it has a chance of working I
wouldn't know > how to modify it so it does, maybe
> > LRS = LinRegSlope(close[ i ], HilbertPeriod[ i
]);Send
BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to
suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check
group FAQ at: <A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|