PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
DT,
But for example RSIa DOES accept the sort of variable you describe as
should ALL other functions.
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
wrote:
> CS,
> something must be more clear:
> Do you speak for a variable period for RSI(periods) or for the RSI
of
> another function?
> When we write RSI(12), we mean RSI calculated on Close, periods=12.
> An example of variable period should be like
> per=10+cum(1)%10;
> W=RSI(per);
> It will not work, since built-in RSI() does not accept variable
> period.
> The second case is to apply the RSI transformation on another
> function, say Stochastics.
> This is already included through the RSIA(Array,periods) function,
> but still for a fixed period.
> It would be better to be more specific, which improvement do you
ask.
> DT
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "CS" <csaxe@xxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Since converting some of my systems to dynamic parameter input,
my
> success (profits) has increased dramatically.
> > Unfortunately, most people don't know the difference between
> dynamic (variable) and static (constant) parameter inputs.
> > Simplistic Hint: Static- RSI(14); Dynamic- RSI( ATR(3) );
> >
> > I have asked TJ to go back and re-work indicators and functions
to
> accept dynamic inputs, but he said that only three other people had
> asked for the same thing, so it is low on his priority list. So, I
> have had to resort to manually coding each indicator/function in
> script, and script sucks. Error messages while debugging are so
> vague, that they are useless.
> > The recent inclusion of native AFL looping and flow control will
> help.
> >
> > There are some functions that accept dynamic input such as HHV,
> LLV, Sum, Ref, AMA, AMA2, WMA, DEMA, TEMA and MA.
> >
> > It would be nice if all new functions/indicators created would
> accept dynamic inputs.
> >
> > -CS
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Fred
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:26 PM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 4.31.0 BETA Question
> >
> >
> > I believe LinRegSlope takes as it's second argument a NON time
> > variant argument or a constant NOT an array like for example
AMA
> > would. I don't know but I supect the code I put in my original
> post
> > won't work any way or if it has a chance of working I wouldn't
> know
> > how to modify it so it does, maybe
> >
> > LRS = LinRegSlope(close[ i ], HilbertPeriod[ i ]);
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Get a FREE REFINANCE QUOTE - click here!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2CXtTB/ca0FAA/i5gGAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|