|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Please
add one more vote for dynamic parameters. I'm sure there would be a lot
more if people took the time to understand the need and/or add it to TJ's wish
list.
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>
TJ
(and a lot of users) would be concerned about the increased CPU time
required. Since it would only be required if the feature is being
used, I think those using it would pay the price.
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
<FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=2>-----Original Message-----From: CS
[mailto:csaxe@xxxxxxx]Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 3:43
AMTo: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: Re: [amibroker]
Re: AmiBroker 4.31.0 BETA Question
Since converting some of my systems to dynamic parameter
input, my success (profits) has increased dramatically.
Unfortunately, most people don't know the difference between
dynamic (variable) and static (constant) parameter inputs.
Simplistic Hint: Static-
RSI(14); Dynamic- RSI( ATR(3)
);
I have asked TJ to go back and re-work indicators and
functions to accept dynamic inputs, but he said that only three other people
had asked for the same thing, so it is low on his priority list. So,
I have had to resort to manually coding each
indicator/function in script, and script sucks. Error messages while debugging
are so vague, that they are useless.
The recent inclusion of native AFL looping and flow
control will help.
There are some functions that accept dynamic input such as
HHV, LLV, Sum, Ref, AMA, AMA2, WMA, DEMA, TEMA and MA.
It would be nice if all new functions/indicators created
would accept dynamic inputs.
-CS
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
>From:
Fred
To: <A title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
href="">amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:26
PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker
4.31.0 BETA Question
I believe LinRegSlope takes as it's second argument a NON
time variant argument or a constant NOT an array like for example AMA
would. I don't know but I supect the code I put in my original
post won't work any way or if it has a chance of working I wouldn't know
how to modify it so it does, maybe LRS = LinRegSlope(close[ i ],
HilbertPeriod[ i ]);Send
BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxSend SUGGESTIONS to
suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx-----------------------------------------Post
AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Web page: <A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)--------------------------------------------Check
group FAQ at: <A
href="">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|