|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Chuck,
I think you were addressing your post to me since it's my email below
yours, but no matter. When I said 200+ trades end to end, what I
meant was 200 trades that don't over lap on the calendar, so for
example if the system were to have 20 trades in play at some given
point to me that counts as only one trade.
Fred
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Chuck Rademacher"
<chuck_rademacher@x> wrote:
> Thanks, Graham. I concur with everything you've said.
>
> For what it is worth, however, I wouldn't trade a system with three
or four
> variables based on less than 3,000 trades... howver many days,
weeks or
> years of data that requires.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred [mailto:fctonetti@x...]
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 10:19 PM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: TESTING THE UNIVERSE ?
>
>
> Grahm,
>
> Questions and/or comments regarding your post.
>
> If you are only trading long then to me it's still imperative to
test
> over bear markets as well unless you have some sort of automated
> filter that keeps you out of bear markets in which case you are
still
> testing over bear markets, aren't you ? It's wonderful to look
back
> in history and say ... well I wouldn't have traded then because it
> was a bear market ... but the question is when did you recognize
that
> it was ? after day one ? month one ? year one ?
>
> The same applies to delisted stocks, doesn't it. No way to know
much
> in advance that they were going to be delisted.
>
> With regards to holding period .vs. testing period IMHO neither 10
> years for those planning to hold 12 months or 1 year for those
> planning on holding 5 days is sufficient although the latter
appears
> to be more viable as there are ~50 potential trades there and
only 10
> in the first scenario. From my porch I don't trade systems that
> don't have 200+ trades in them end to end.
>
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Graham" <gkavanagh@xxxx> wrote:
> > I don't see the need for testing multitudes of stocks that no
> longer exist
> > nor for testing over large periods of time, nor having a large
> basket of
> > stocks available on your search list.
> >
> > As far as I see all you need is a timeframe to cover various
market
> trends
> > (bull/bear/sideways) and enough stocks to make it viable. I
would
> also look
> > at how you trade, long only, or long and short trades, etc. If
you
> only
> > trade long, why test over a bear period. Logic would tell you
that
> your
> > system will not be as profitable, and thus you should maybe
stand
> aside till
> > your system matches the market. Your keeping of records against
a
> certain
> > criteria of win/loss ratio, or profit/loss ratio would tell you
> when your
> > system is out of synch with the market. Either you have multiple
> systems or
> > keep adjusting the one system to suit current conditions would
be
> options.
> >
> > The stocks you select for the testing should be consistently
traded
> > throughout your test period, so I ignore any that closed or
started
> during
> > the period. Your timeframe of testing should also be in line
with
> your
> > trading timeframe. The test period should be longer than your
trade
> > timeframe. I can only make a stab at this as I have only tested
to
> suit my
> > style, but if you intend to hold for 12 month periods, then you
> test over a
> > 10 year frame, or for holds of 5 days, I would think that a test
> over 12
> > months would be sufficient.
> >
> > The size of your stock basket for systems should be related to
your
> trading.
> > A small short-term trader can only manage a relatively small
number
> of
> > trades at one time due to size of capital, and the human
ability to
> manage
> > them. A larger trader/investor would have a different aspect
being
> able to
> > manage a larger basket due to more capital, and a longer term
> perspective
> > easier to manage more trades. So if you can only manage 2 trades
> per week,
> > why have a system that provides 20 entry signals weekly. A
trader
> who makes
> > 20 trades per week would need a system to signal more than 2,
but
> would not
> > need 100 signals each week. So you would need to combine the
number
> of
> > stocks to search and the trade signal system to match your
> requirements.
> >
> > At the end of all this nonsense I have said, there is one thing
> that really
> > counts. The methods and systems you use for trading must be
> suitable for you
> > personally. What one person does will probably not suit another.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Graham
> >
> > <http://groups.msn.com/ASXShareTrading>
> > http://groups.msn.com/ASXShareTrading
> >
> > <http://groups.msn.com/FMSAustralia>
> http://groups.msn.com/FMSAustralia
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jayson [mailto:jcasavant@x...]
> > Sent: Sunday, 30 March 2003 7:30 AM
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [amibroker] TESTING THE UNIVERSE ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Gosub,
> >
> >
> >
> > there will certainly be many on the other side of this
discussion
> but FWIW I
> > try to define a universe that will trade best with a given
> strategy. For
> > instance my universe has certain price, average volume and
market
> cap
> > requirements. I agree that some stocks have certain
personalities
> that tend
> > to work best with certain systems. Others will argue that a
Robust
> system
> > should work equally well in any market. The challenge with the
first
> > approach is that depending on how far back you you are testing
the
> > personality may be very different now than it was at the start
of
> your
> > testing period, especially if you test back 10+ years. Look at
> MSFT, AOL and
> > CSCO as examples....
> >
> >
> >
> > Jayson
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gosub283 [mailto:gosub283@x...]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 5:28 PM
> > To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [amibroker] TESTING THE UNIVERSE ?
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Please bear with me on this subject because
> > it's one which I have not yet found the answer
> > and one which I am not an expert. This question is based
> > on my current assumptions and is open to comment,
> > correction, or debate.
> >
> > (This has been discussed before but, as an onlooker,
> > I did not see a solution.)
> >
> > Here it is:
> >
> > What is the point of testing the whole universe
> > of stocks with a trading system if it is generally
> > understood that..
> > A) Some stocks are just not "system" tradeable
> > B) Some systems are best suited to certain markets.
> > C) Some stocks have unique "personalities" which work
> > with some trading techniques but not others.
> >
> > It seems to me that a test of the whole universe will give
> > a squewed result because the performance of the system
> > will be lowered by the "untradeables" and the ones with
> > the "wrong personality".
> >
> > I have written filters which divide up the universe into two
> > personality groups.(Good ones on the left...bad ones on the
right)
> > This has helped to narrow down the basket a little.
> > But maybe there's another reason to test the whole universe
> > that I m not aware of. Any comments on this ? (for or against)
> >
> > PS: I think the focus should be on devising ways to define
> > and catagorize "personalities", then go exploit them.
> > (Definately easier said than done) ;-(
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Gosub283
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> > Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Check group FAQ at:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> >
> >
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> >
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=243066.2784921.4151384.1769302/D=egroupweb/S=17
> 056321
> > 98:HM/A=1377500/R=0/*http:/www.verisign.com/cgi-bin/go.cgi?
> a=b31540113206004
> > 000>
> >
> >
> >
> > <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
> M=243066.2784921.4151384.1769302/D=egroupmai
> > l/S=:HM/A=1377500/rand=329115638>
> >
> >
> > Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> > Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Check group FAQ at:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
>
> Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxx
> Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxx
> -----------------------------------------
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> --------------------------------------------
> Check group FAQ at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Make Money Online Auctions! Make $500.00 or We Will Give You Thirty Dollars for Trying!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/yMx78A/fNtFAA/i5gGAA/GHeqlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Send BUG REPORTS to bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send SUGGESTIONS to suggest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
--------------------------------------------
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|