|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello,
> Hi
> Why you always blame on others?
I don't blame on others I just state the fact that AmiBroker.com is
NOT a data vendor and bad ticks you complain about are delivered by eSignal.
This is plain fact. You are paying montly fee to eSignal for the DATA
you are not paying for the data to amibroker.com.
Isn't it?
> and make it sound like your "toy" is
> perfect. I see that in a lot of other posts.
Please point me to a single post in which I state
that AmiBroker is perfect or has no bugs.
I never wrote this and it would be nice if we keep talking
about the facts.
> Yes you may be right that they should provide the filter in data
> manager but I have other programs I use who also feed from eSignal
> and I have NO PROBLEMS with them
> Only with Amibroker!
See above. Hmm.. now you just wrote that all remaining
programs you have no problems .... that's interesting ( I thought that
there are no programs without bugs)
>
> And now that I think about is better to filter outside of data
> manager - more flexibility.
Could you tell me what flexibility is provided by bad data?
> ...and bad ticks and out of range ticks is not eSignal always problem
> I have more bad ticks( sometimes the same one) in other data
> streamers programs.
> and they will always be there.
So now you say that there *are* problems with other programs.
> I'm amazed that you do not give more importance to this.
I wrote that I will provide the filter. What should I do more?
Should I jump from the window ?
> I hardly wait to have this implemented
> Until then I cannot really use it for live action.
But you have so many other applications installed
with which you don't have problems at all as you wrote.
So it will be good time to work with those programs because
they are so nice, user friendly and so well performing.
And they are not toys because they were costing
that much.
> Is just a nice but difficult and confusing
> (workspace,symbols,groups,sectors) "toy" .
Interesting statement. I thought that toys are for children
and therefore they are easy to use and learn and they do
not cause confusion.
If something is complicated it can not be really used
by a child because it requires reading the manual.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:38 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: Bad ticks
> --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko" <amibroker@xxxx>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > When fixup does not help - it means that ESIGNAL has this bad
> > tick still on their servers. Until they fix it on their
> server "fixup" won't help.
> > You may call them up to fix the data by the way.
> >
> > Please understand that basically it is feed's responsibility to
> filter bad ticks.
> > eSignal does not do that and this is their fault.
> > They implemented filter only in their program instead of DATA
> MANAGER.
> > It should be done by the Turbofeed data manager.
> >
> > I will provide bad tick filter but... please undestand that
> > it is really not my fault that data vendor feeds you with bad data.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Tomasz Janeczko
> > amibroker.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <adrian@xxxx>
> > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:03 PM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Bad ticks
> >
> >
> > > I did all of that
> > > The out of range tick came back!
> > > Fixup history does not help at all or not working ( I never could
> fix
> > > bad ticks using that)
> > > However after I kept editing from quote editor is ok now
> > > BUT that's beside the point
> > > How come there is no filter for out of range ticks like in
> eSignal ?
> > > ...and others...
> > > Is it something I 'd look forwartd to? :)
> > > I think is a very important issue. Backtests results could be
> > > extremly out of reality and one does not know that 2 month ago
> there
> > > were 3 bad ticks. It makes the whole thing totaly unusable
> > > thx
> > > adrian
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Tomasz Janeczko"
> <amibroker@xxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Either delete /edit them via Symbol->Quote Editor
> > > > or choose "Fixup history for current symbol"
> > > > from right mouse menu (over plugin status field showing "OK")
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Tomasz Janeczko
> > > > amibroker.com
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: <adrian@xxxx>
> > > > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:50 PM
> > > > Subject: [amibroker] Bad ticks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi
> > > > > How can I get rid or filter bad, out of range ticks?
> > > > > like Brcm at 10:25 am ?
> > > > > adrian
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to:
> amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> > > > >
> > > > > Check group FAQ at:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
> > >
> > > Check group FAQ at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
> Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
>
> Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|