|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Al,
Although I won't disagree with this approach as I've used it myself,
I will also tell you that it does have the potential for missing the
most robust area.
If for example in using the 25 to 200 by 25 apporach it turns up 100
as having the best results one would then be tempted to optimize from
75 to 125 by some smaller increment say 5. However because of the
span of the original increment ( 25 ) the most robust area may in
fact be "hiding" between 53 and 71 which of course gets totally
missed. These things become a tradeoff between available computer
time and other priorities, but I will tell you I do upon occasion set
up optimizations in the evening knowing that they won't finish until
the following morning.
Fred
--- In amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Al Venosa" <avcinci@xxxx> wrote:
>
Post AmiQuote-related messages ONLY to: amiquote@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amiquote/messages/)
Check group FAQ at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/groupfaq.html
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|