[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AB vs Wealth Lab



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

As far as I know, $650/$89 is 7.3 and not 6.5.
Do I miss any details ?
Dimitris Tsokakis
--- In amibroker@xxxx, dave oooo <david346@xxxx> wrote:
> 
> 6.5 higher in COST,but AB WILL IMPROVE!!!will WL
> sguod99 <dnstarich@xxxx> wrote: This question may have been asked 
before but I can't find it in the 
> AB thread index. What do the members of this thread see as the 
> advantages of Amibroker vs Wealth-Lab Developer aside from cost? I 
> have an evaluation copy of both and have played around with each in 
a 
> fairly simple way. From what I can tell both have large supportive 
> user groups, both support my QP2 data vendor (but AB may offer more 
> QP2 fundamental data support), both have powerful 
trading/backtesting 
> languages, AB adds support for JScript & VBScript in-line dlls 
(many 
> of which are available via the AB Yahoo database), WL has a huge on-
> line trading strategy script base, WL allows its language to 
> reference multiple tickers in the same script (not sure if AB 
does?), 
> and WL has a slick user interface with lots of graphical 
> presentations including a neat 3-D optimization variable map.
> 
> I do understand that Thomasz is working on an improved charting 
> engine/user interface for V4.2. But if I were to sum up at this 
date 
> my conclusion is that, for about 6.5X the cost, WL offers roughly 
> what AB does plus a very professional user interface and a large 
> number of trading scripts at their website.
> 
> Is this an accurate comparison or an over simplification? Are 
there 
> other factors that I'm overlooking? Thanks in advance for your 
> response.
> 
> Doug 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor Click here to find your contact lenses!
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
Service. 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes