PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi,
I am just curious, what doest it mean "returned an e-book"?
How does it look like?
Thanks,
Mike
--- In amibroker@xxxx, "netbull2000" <netbull2000@xxxx> wrote:
> > The company does not care about AmiBroker, they already have
their
> > script built into their own software program that recieves data
> from
> > Quotes Plus, therefore the purchaser does not even have to write
> any
> > code. Software is given free with the book. But to continue data
> > download, I think you have to pay a monthly fee to Quotes Plus or
> > some other data provider.
> >
>
> You would not have to pay the monthly fee if the system was coded
for
> Amibroker, you would only have to buy Amibroker if you did not have
> it already. Now, Amibroker 4.0 is only $89 and the monthly fee for
> QP2 is ca $26, that is by buying Amibroker you gain over
subscribing
> to QP2 after only 4 months. That's why the system developer should
be
> interested in coding his system for Amibroker, because it's just a
> big advantage for its prospective users.
>
> Now, I ordered the e-book in question and then returned it and
> received a refund. I am not using the system. One can easily come
up
> with a variety of systems of this kind and I am not convinced that
> this particular system was the best of them.
>
> I believe that as long as you will honestly not use the system, you
> can return the book, but you can still order it just to see if the
> system makes sense for you. That's what trials are all about, after
> all. Asking others about their opinions in this matter is one thing
> and seeing the system in action is another. After all, what suits
you
> may not suit others and vice versa. Plus, as I said, you have
nothing
> to lose. You may even make money using it and so then you would not
> have to return the book.
>
> The system does produce enough signals to trade, 10-30 a week. Of
> course, that does not mean yet that all setups are completely
> successful, so you may actually have 5 or so entries per week only.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> netbull2000
>
|