PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hello Thomas,
You had made a reference to checking it in a previous message
and I was waiting for your seemingly qualified second opinion
as to whether it compared well with what you may know to be correct.
It is not necessary.
You wrote in Message number 14192;
"The code is not from me, i'vecopied
it a long time ago from the board.
I'm also on the way to check it."
Thomas
HaND,
Brian
----- Original Message-----
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
<DIV
>From:
Thomas Zmuck
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: StochK
calculated
Brian wrote:
Hello,For the Stoch %K and Full
Stochastics,Check the thread starting atMessage number
14187MaybeThomas Zmuckis finished double checking the code out for
us by now and will share theresults.HaND,Brian
<FONT face=Arial
size=2>
Brian, i'm not
sure, what you mean with double checking.
Whatshould i
check. If you have any wish to check, i do it, but i dont no, what do
check.
<FONT face=Arial
size=2>
<FONT face=Arial
size=2>Thomas
Thomas Zmuck
msn-messenger:<A
href="">thomas_zm@xxxx
<BLOCKQUOTE
>
----- Original Message -----
<DIV
>From:
saltyla1
To: <A
href=""
title=amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:38
AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: StochK
calculated
Hello,For theStoch %K
and Full Stochastics,Check the thread starting atMessage number
14187MaybeThomas Zmuckis finished double checking the code out
for us by now and will share theresults.HaND,Brian-----
Original Message -----From: willem1940> Thanks for your
input.> Tried your suggestion but the result is less as my current
formula.> Assuming you tried your suggestion did you get good
results?> Willem Jan>> --- In amibroker@xxxx, "Mike
Lucero" <m.lucero@xxxx> wrote:> >> > How
about:> > STK=10;> >
PercK=(C-LLV(ma(L,3),STK))/(HHV(ma(H,3),STK)-LLV(ma(L,3),STK))*100;>
> ----- Original Message -----> > From: willem1940>>
To: amibroker@xxxx> > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 1:38
AM> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: StochK calculated>
>> >> > Anthony,> >> > Thanks for
your response. It brought me in the right direction.> > On basis
of your input I produced the simple model below to check> if>
> StochK and StochD are the same as the outcome of my formula.>
> If you apply the AFL below to any stock you will notice:> >
PercK is the so called slow stochastic with a factor 3.> >
Consequently it should be the same as StochK with its internal> >
slowing of factor 3.> > If you apply this to a certain stock you
will notice that on> several> > dates the outcome is the
same, for others not however mostly close.> > This I don't
understand. The database is the same so there must> > somewhere
some fine tuning I miss.> >> > If you subsequently look
at the StochD column in comparison with> the> > PercD
column you will notice the same phenomenae.> >> > Same
question: where do I lack in understanding?> >> >
Thanks, Willem Jan> >> >> > file://Stochastics
insight//> >> > STK=10;> >> >
file://Dperiods=1;//This is the number of time periods used when>
> calculating A moving average of %K. The moving average is called
"%> D"> > AND is usually displayed as A dotted line ontop
of %K.> > file://DMethod="e";//The method (i.e., Exponential,
Simple, Time Series,> > Triangular, Variable, or Weighted) that is
used to calculate %D.> >> >
PercK=(Sum(C-LLV(L,STK),3)/Sum(HHV(H,STK)-LLV(L,STK),3))*100;//Slow>
> Stochastic %K Slowingperiods=3;This value controls the internal>
> smoothing of %K. A value of 1 is considered a fast stochastic;
a> > value of 3 is considered a slow stochastic.> >
PercD=MA(PercK,3);//Dperiods=1;This is the number of time periods>
> used when calculating A moving average of %K. The moving average
is> > called "%D" AND is usually displayed as A dotted line on top
of %K.> >> >> > Filter=1;> >>
> NumColumns = 4;> > Column0=PercK;Column0Name="PercK";>
> Column1=StochK(STK);Column1Name="StochK(STK)";> >
Column2=PercD;Column2Name="PercD";> >
Column3=StochD(stk);Column3Name="StochD(stk)";> > --- In
amibroker@xxxx, Anthony Faragasso <ajf1111@xxxx> wrote:> >
> Willem,> > >> > > pds=5;> > >
file://Stoch %K-- Custom Formula calculates a ( n ) period %K with
a3> > > period slowing> > >
Stok=(Sum(C-LLV(L,pds),3)/Sum(HHV(H,pds)-LLV(L,pds),3))>
*100;//Custom> > > formula> > >> > >
file://Stoch %D-- custom formula calculates a 3 period %D of the %K>
> formula> > > above.> > >
StoD=ema(stok,3);//custom formula> > >> > >As far
as matching with the built in StochK, I can not answer> that.>
> >> > > Anthony> > >> >
>> > > willem1940 wrote:> > >> >>
> StochK calculated> > > >> > > > I
have tried to write the StochK in a formula format.> > >
>> > > > Formula:> > > > %k= MA(((Close-
LLV(C,pds))/(HHV(C,pds) - LLV(C,pds)))*100,3);> > >
>> > > > pds = %k period> > > >>
> > > The result of this calcualtion I compare with
StochK(pds).> > > >> > > > To the best of my
knowledge this should deliver the same result> as> > >
> the formula; however it does not.> > > > Can anyone
point out where I go wrong?> > > >> > >
>> > > > Willem JanYouruse
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A
href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|