|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Peter (that is your name correct?),
I don't know you and you don't know me yet you claim to be able to tell me
the unpleasant truths about myself. A sarcastic comment by Tom prompted you
to retaliate with a 'you deserved it' comment?! I find that very offensive
and rude (I guess I should start making these type of assumptions about
Aussies, huh?) and totally - TOTALLY - uncalled for.
Your comment was made to piss somebody off - well it worked!
If this is your attempt at 'facetiousness' (read humorous) take it someplace
else!
Peter (not the Aussie 'P') Gialames
-----Original Message-----
From: server not recognized [mailto:winchp@x...]
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 1:52 AM
To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Candlestick-Analyzer
As you ask, its a bit off topic. But sometimes only your best friends can
tell you some of the
unpleasant truths about yourself and still want to be your friend and still
stand by your side.
BTW did you read the rest?
P
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Gialames" <investor@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: Candlestick-Analyzer
> >>Is it any wonder people plaster your buildings over the sidewalk?
>
> This was totally uncalled for!!! What did you hope to accomplish by this
> statement???
>
> Peter Gialames
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: server not recognized [mailto:winchp@x...]
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 12:45 AM
> To: amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Candlestick-Analyzer
>
>
> Typical goddam yank. Arrogant, insular and isolationist.
>
> As if the world revolves around the DJ! Schesh. Is it any wonder people
> plaster your buildings over the sidewalk?
>
> Now I've got that off my chest.., in Steve Nisons book, "Japanese
> Candlestick Charting techniques" he investigated candlesticks in
> 1987 and first published in 1990. He says centuries old technique very
> little known in west, in fact hardly anything in English
> before 87. So this standard reference text is about the ancient Japanese
> rice market, adapted to the Japanese stock market by
> Japanese. Then translated into English and published. Not once are any
of
> the combinations backtested. A good few examples of
> what they look like in a chart performing how they are supposed to work,
but
> no substantial evaluation of success. So is it not
> unreasonable to first check the validity? I think in AB it would be dead
> simple to access a score for each formation included and
> backtest. I know that a commercial group has done exactly this and
> discovered that the results are less than great, and re-casting
> the formations was necessary and the substance of their commercial
offering.
>
> As an approach to trading I think pattern seeking is fine, I'm only
> suggesting that the proper care and caution be applied before
> using them with real money.
>
> Now if, we can avoid the facetiousness in future we'll all be better off.
>
> P
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom McDaniel" <tmtempe@xxxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 12:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Candlestick-Analyzer
>
>
> > Hmmmm. Does anyone have a data source for the Dow Jones back to the
17th
> century? Yahoo doesn't go back that far.
> >
> > -TM
> >
> > server not recognized wrote:
> >
> > > I take your comments in good humour Dimitri, but I have read of
recent
> formations only being about 40% successful i.e
> consistent
> > > with what they were supposed to do. Others were completely
contrarian,
> either indicating irregularly or completely the opposite
> of
> > > what they were supposed to indicate.
> > >
> > > I'd therefore suggest a back test count on each before simply
accepting
> them.
> > >
> > > P
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "DIMITRIS TSOKAKIS" <TSOKAKIS@xxxx>
> > > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:58 AM
> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Candlestick-Analyzer
> > >
> > > > Well, well...
> > > > Yuki is trading 30 years, you are 300 year trader, I think it is the
> > > > proper time to move to a newbies rock+roll T/A site...
> > > > DT
> > > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, "server not recognized" <winchp@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you checked each candlestick formation because I recall they
> > > > don't work like they did in the 17th century.
> > > > >
> > > > > P
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Tom Supera
> > > > > To: amibroker@xxxx
> > > > > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:03 PM
> > > > > Subject: [amibroker] Candlestick-Analyzer
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's my formula for candlestick-detecting, but it's in work
and
> > > > also not complete and not optimized.
> > > > > If anyone of you are interested to share and optimize the
formula
> > > > with me, i'm happy.
> > > > > After them, i work on a trading system with CCI or MRI, any
> > > > overbought/oversold indicator, volume and the candlestick analyzer.
> > > > > I think it's one of the best way to make a good winning system.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your help
> > > > >
> > > > > Tom Supera
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > > > Service.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|