|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dear Tomasz,
Thanks for the deatiled explanation.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomasz Janeczko" <amibroker@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Message board - Let's give it a try
> Dear John,
>
> I installed VBulletin Lite version which is free. User profiles
> and more advanced stuff is available in paid version ($89 a year)
> of VBulletin software.
>
> I decided to install a free version just to have some feedback
> and to see how web-based board will work for you and me.
>
> Yesterday Manioc has generously offered his unused license for the paid
> version to be used for the evaluation on AmiBroker site.
>
> I have tested the full version on my local machine and
> while it is superior to the "lite" product it also consumes much more
> server resources (RAM, MySQL server space, processing time),
> can generate *LOTS* of web & e-mail traffic if mail notifications are
used,
> and generally speaking is much heavier.
>
> I use rented server space and I have to pay for excessive resource use.
> A "lite" version is much more polite to the server resources.
>
> Unfortunatelly even paid version does NOT have a feature that
> I find to be very useful for me: the ability to download all the new
messages
> to my computer, disconnect, write the responses offline and then
> send them all in one bulk as I do with ordinary e-mails or newsgroup
(NNTP) messages.
> Why I would need such functionality?
> Simply bacause I travel often, and connect to the internet using various
> methods (DSL, standard dial-up, or even GSM mobile phone 9.6K connection)
and it is important
> to me to minimize the bandwidth and connection time.
>
> So, because I miss some important functionality and I would like to
"lighten" server usage a bit
> I would need to tweak the code by myself.
> Then - if I need to tweak the code is it better to tweak the free "lite"
version or
> full one? At this point I don't have an answer.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> ===============
> AmiBroker - the comprehensive share manager.
> http://www.amibroker.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John R" <jrdrp@xxxx>
> To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Message board - Let's give it a try
>
>
> > I thought there should be some user profile configuration options where
user
> > can choose to select to receive all message posts via email.
> >
> > John
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <lemanioc@xxxx>
> > To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:13 PM
> > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Message board - Let's give it a try
> >
> >
> > > --- In amibroker@xxxx, b519b@xxxx wrote:
> > > > I have visited the new message board (link below) and it looks very
> > > > promising. TJ has given it several divisions for beginners,
> > > advanced
> > > > (AFL discussions), etc. One thing I really like is being able to
> > > > quickly scan the replies give to a post. That alone will save me a
> > > > lot of time -- I was always clicking back and forward on the
> > > replies
> > > > lists with the eGroup set up.
> > > >
> > > > I've put a couple posts in the AFL section suggesting naming
> > > > conventions. Threads will be very helpful if they are named
> > > > appropriately. Since I am not an expert in AFL, I hope others will
> > > > give even better naming suggestions than I have given to get the
> > > > discusssion going.
> > > >
> > > > So let's try out the new board. See you there.
> > >
> > > Yes, it looks really promising, and if Tomasz decide to install the
> > > full version, the board will have much more feature we will enjoy.
> > >
> > > Manioc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
|