|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi Jeff,
Please try
e3=IIF(b1==1 and d3==1,10,-10);
instead of:
> e3=IIF(b1=d3=1,10,-10);
the '==' checks equivalence, while the '=' is for assignment. ie in
your equation you are assigning to b1 and d3 the value of 1.
I'm not sure if you need the 'and' I havent tested it, but I would
use it just to be sure.
Cliff Elion
--- In amibroker@xxxx, "Jeff Gholson" <jgholson@xxxx> wrote:
> Ok...I've looked at this thing until I'm cross-eyed. It seems like
it
> should function properly but it doesn't for me...sometimes it helps
to have
> others to look at it so here it goes...
>
> b1=IIF(close>ref(close, -1),1,-1);
> f1=IIF(close>ma(close,10),2,-2);
> d2=IIF(close>ma(close,20),3,-3);
> e2=IIF(ma(close,10)>ma(close,20),1,-1);
> d3=IIF(volume>ma(volume,20),1,-1);
>
> e3=IIF(b1=d3=1,10,-10);
>
> graph0=e3;
>
>
> The problem is the e3! It will not change! It remains at +10. I
have
> manually ran this against price data that should turn it to -10,but
it won't
> change in the program. When the e3 IIF statement is introduced b1
and d3
> "magically" always read the same. However, when the e3 IIF is
removed, b1
> and d3,read the way they are supposed too. Sometimes they are equal
> sometimes not, which is supposed to change the e3 IIF when in the
AFL...
>
> So I leave this problem to the AFL Gods...and may the FORCE BE WITH
YOU!
>
>
>
> Thanks
|