[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [amibroker] Groups and ASX



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

using them for personal area's eg upward trending , channel trades etc
is how I use them .
the only problem is a stock cannot resides in 2 groups
so you cannot have asx top 50 top 100 top 200 and upward trending as some
stocks belong to several groups ...
Which is why I was after several fav groups so that I didn't trash the order
of my data ..

I suspect markets could be used to achieve a segregation of data but haven't
yet explored the idea

Regard David

----- Original Message -----
From: <andem@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 9:55 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Groups and ASX


> Tomasz, I'm not clear about "Groups" in stocks-->categories-->groups,
> despite having read the "Help" files, Newsletters and trawled through
> these posts. Plenty of references but I've yet to achieve "YES!
> THAT'S IT!"
>
> "Markets" is clear enough. The Australian Stock Market, ASX.
>
> "Sectors" is also clear. In Australia we have, for instance,
> the "Gold" Sector made up the Gold producers, Gold explorers, Gold
> investors etc. The "Media" sector made up of Publishers, Radio
> broadcasters, Television broadcasters etc.
>
> "Industries" are those industries within the Sectors. As above, Gold
> producers, Gold explorers, Gold investors etc are all "Industries".
>
> I am not aware, in the ASX, of an official breakdown of any of the
> above into "Groups". Is it an Ami phenomenon, something to do with
> NYSE or am I missing the bleedin' obvious?
>
> My question is what, specifically, should be in the "Groups"
> assignments and what Base Index for Relative Strength should I assign
> to each group?
>
> Lots of AFL's require this to be correct so I would like to get it
> right. I'm particularly interested in Geoff and David's
> interpretation of Chris Tate's method. (Geoff, I'll reply to your
> answer to my query serapately. Been on hols)
>
> I have, in AmiBroker, been making "Groups" identification names and
> numbers the same as "Sectors" identification names and numbers. For
> instance, I've made Group 1 to be "Gold" and Sector 1 I've also
> made "Gold". Is this the way to go?
>
> A second question. In light of the rapid responses you make to
> queries, the constant stream of updates to Ami and maintaining a
> particularly user-friendly website, do you ever get any sleep......?
>
> Many thanks from Downunder.
>
> Max Andersen
> Orange NSW
> Australia
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>