|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Hi All,
I am back from Switzerland ready to help you :-)
> 1) I'd vote for a 'generic parameters' feature. It will allow the
As for now I want to focust on providing you more analytical tools.
The database-related issues (as this one) will be considered for
addition in the future. Obviously such "generic" data fields would be nice
but there is a problem of ensuring compatibility between databases.
It is necessary that no matter what individual parameters one user will
add the other should be able to read it.
>
> 2) Could you provide ability to check AFL variable against {EMPTY}?
> Something like
> inLongTrade = IIF (inLongTrade == {EMPTY}, 0, inLongTrade);
Yes, of course, this will be included in the next version. Nice idea , btw.
Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
===============
AmiBroker - the comprehensive share manager.
http://www.amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <rasnitsyn@xxxx>
To: <amibroker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 4:36 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: New suggestions
>
> Thank you,
> Dima.
>
>
> --- In amibroker@xxxx, Donald Dalley <ddalley@xxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Tomasz:
> >
> > It seems some mail has not made it through to me and you may not
> have received
> > some from me, so I hope this gets through.
> >
> > You were apparently asking for more suggestions. I have a few new
> ones for
> > you.
> >
> > Can you add room for some needed fundamental per share numbers,
> such as debt,
> > cash, losses per share (or maybe allow -EPS?) and cash flow, and
> dividend
> > history records? To be able to see % growth (without doing a song &
> dance) in
> > appropriate numbers would help, too. I know some fundamental
> figures are on
> > your To-Do list, but fundamentals haven't been bolstered as much
> lately as
> > other parts of the program.
> >
> > Can you make the defaults for all such numbers (shares, book value,
> etc.)
> > blank? If no numbers have been manually entered into a gadget, zero
> is an
> > inaccurate way to describe outstanding shares, for example, but a
> company
> > could have zero debt.
> >
> > It would also be interesting to be able to make AFL searches with
> > consideration for companies with zero debt and loads of cash (or
> ranked by the
> > least debt and/or most cash)! I believe someone mentioned something
> similar to
> > this for AFL recently, but having a programming language link to
> fundamental
> > data has to be one of my oldest unmet requests.
> >
> > Having a place to record the class or series of a stock is still
> needed. Some
> > shares, such as prefereds, can have a confusing mix of information
> in their
> > tickers (i.e. XYZ.PR.J could be series 3; an untagged XYZ could
> actually be an
> > A or B class issue), so a way of clarifying this info may help some
> of us.
> >
> > To your credit, Tomasz, you implimented most of the last big bunch
> of features
> > I asked to be added, so folks, keep your ideas coming. You just
> might get what
> > you wanted!
> >
> > --
> >
> > ---===///||| Donald Dalley |||\\\===---
> > The World of AmiBroker Support
> > http://webhome.idirect.com/~ddalley
> > UIN/ICQ#: 65203020
>
>
>
>
>
|