|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
But But But !!!! Ben killed Bambi !!!!!
I just couldn't resist. Keep taking care of yourself Bob, we
all love ya.
Dick
At 01:27 PM 9/17/2009, you wrote:
I can only repeat what I told you already. Do not attack Ben or
anyone else on this list.
Bob
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Bobh
<Bobh59@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
- Point 1 - It wasn't an attack - it was a
review of the facts.
- Point 2 - If someone is going to be permitted to spam us multiple
times a week then we have the right to challenge him and demand proof of
value & self-proclaimed skills.
- Point 3 - This guy has been allowed to spam this list with abandon
and I'm not the first one to object - just the first one to object in the
manner I did. And I chose that manner on purpose.
- Point 4 - I don't care what he or anyone else posts nor do I care
that he operates a training service. In fact I would fight for his
right to do both even though I don't think much of either. I'm only
objecting to the constant solicitations.
- Point 5 - I'm not objecting to all solicitations either, and think we
should use Jim's post of 9/10 as a model for the future because it was
both professionally done and respectful to the group.
- In closing, instead of telling me what I can or cannot do (good luck
with that), why don't you do your job and address the source of the
problem.
- Bob
- On 9/16/2009 9:41 PM, Robert Arbuckle wrote:
-
- If you don't like his posts, ignore them but do not attack him or
anyone else here again!
-
- Bob
- On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Bobh
<Bobh59@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
- Actually I have followed his record and
stand by every word in my post. The only reason I got involved
today was because of the way Dan was treated for simply asking tough
questions of a spammer. And the specific post I mentioned occurred
on 8/1 when the S&P was at 980ish and was as follows:
- Attach is the weekly look at the
market
- As you can see in last few years we got some nice buys
- (When blue line went from under lower line to close above it)
- Now the opposite have happen
- The blue line went from above top line to under it
- This gives you next week to bail out of you IRA 401K and all
conservative money
- In regards to
contributions you
kinda sorta have a point but when you look at the activity level of this
forum it would also be true for 99.5% of members. Plus half of the
posts you consider to be contributions were outright spam and the other
half are predictions/forecasts, and I don't believe these have any place
in trading and therefore don't waste any time on them. But if you
ever want to talk trading then I think I could make some worthwhile
contributions.
- If instead you just want to shut me up on
this subject then the solution is quite simple - prove me wrong.
And you can easily attempt to do this by you and your ah, mentor, opening
up a free IRC chat room for a couple of weeks and show us all how it's
done in real-time.
- Back when I was involved in the training
biz I ran a chat room and did this for several reasons. First,
there's no place to hide in real-time. Second, real-time is FUN;
hindsight training is necessary to a degree but boring and can only get
you so far; and predicting as I've already said I regard as a complete
waste of time. And third, the real-time component is the most
valuable part of any training program, by far.
- I look forward to your response.
- On 9/16/2009 10:29 AM, Code 2 wrote:
-
- Ben's record is actually surprising accurate ... that is, if you
took
- the time to look at it.
- I'll take Ben's "broken record" over your contributions (oh
wait, what
- contributions!) any day of the week.
- From: Bobh
<Bobh59@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 6:22:31 AM
- Subject: [RT] sp500
- A broken record that's been continually wrong for the last 200
S&P
- points but one that can't go a few days without treating us to
another
- sleazy solicitation.
- I've lost track of how many tops you've called during this rally,
but
- I do recall on the 2nd one that you advised us all to liquidate
our
- IRA's, 401k's, etc. (like anyone would be foolish enough to take
- financial advice from someone like you). More importantly, I
can't
- find a single "buy" during this time. In my book this is a
textbook
- example of how not to trade and should be studied by all
aspiring
- traders as an example of what not to do.
- I've also seen copies of your training materials and IMO the
only
- thing about them that should be taken seriously is the price tag.
And
- I know that your so called proprietary indicators are anything
but
- proprietary and can be easily replicated by the standard
squigglies
- that come with most charting programs. And this has been documented
on
- other forums complete with charts that left zero doubt.
- You've also been kicked off other forums for violating anti-spam
- policies, retro trades, imaginary fills, misrepresentations and
other
- bad behavior. And I was happy to play a small role in making
that
- happen on one forum but in that case I knew we had a moderator(s)
that
- would do the right thing. Sadly that isn't the case on this
forum
- where it's more likely I will get kicked or censored while they
- continue to coddle and protect you.
- Now I'm sure Larry and others in your small band of followers
are
- going to regard this post as claptrap and start with their cries
of
- "negativity" or "why can't we all just grab our ankles
and get along"
- or "you have nothing to prove". I say bollocks to all of
that because
- once you cross the line from contributor to spammer you not only
lose
- privileges but you have everything to prove.
- Others in this group have legitimate products and services for
sale
- but never take advantage of the nebulous no-spam policy or lack
of
- leadership on this forum. I suggest - strongly - that from this
point
- forward you do the same.
- Bob
- On 9/15/2009 11:22 PM, Ben wrote:
- Hate to sound like a broken record
- Attach are 4 charts
- Top left is sp500 with the regression line
- Bottom left is CUMILATIVE market barometer
- See the obvious bearish divergence,
- The top right chart is the macd histogram on volume McClellan
osc,
- Bottom right is the actual macd lines
- (It only went on a buy today)
- After this entire advance?
- That is a VERY big bad divergence
- Ben
- Soon
- Timing4commodities.com
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.103/2378 - Release Date:
09/17/09 06:18:00
__._,_.___
![]()
__,_._,___
|