RE: [RT] Cost of the economic rescue so far

[Gene Pope <gene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jim,

Just because I have a family history in print media (and not based on my political views), I just wish to point out that Obama was referring to his admittedly less than stellar bowling game which he referred to as “looking like the Special Olympics”…

Off topic, but in the days before Drudge, the internet, and instant dissemination of information, our politicians said lots of stupid things without it becoming front page news… in fact, the press often had a “wink and nod” relationship with presidents (witness FDR and his non-existent wheelchair, Kennedy with his White House dalliances and drug use. Then things changed with Nixon. What was once considered rude lack-of-respect became the media’s right to know). I actually feel bad for any public figure today. They are completely exposed naked to the world all the time. You can’t say boo without everybody knowing your business. Thankless job that I wouldn’t want. Then again, I happen to feel that it’s a good thing that this less savory layer is being peeled back for everyone to see. Who hasn’t watched current live congressional hearings and just shaken their heads at the utter lack of knowledge displayed and the brainless questions? Yet the mooing populace keeps voting them back in office.

Regards,
Gene

I won’t give you links.  As Obama would say our administration “…is like the special Olympics.”  And as Biden was taped “Give me a f______g break.”  What lovely people.  Of course, you won’t get that in your mainstream news but they’re on tape.   

 

From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Terry Rhodes
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 12:58 AM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RT] Cost of the economic rescue so far

 

Do you have any links to support your statements???

 

regards, 
 

tbr

 

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< 

Last week our fearless leaders arrogantly declared that any nation not meeting the US lofty standards embodied in cap and trade would be barred from exporting goods to the US.  Within 4 hours, China shot back that if the US would not buy its goods, China would not buy its Treasuries.  Game over.  And then today, China proposed a new world currency that would be administered by the IMF.  Clearly, China thinks the US is one great Maddof scheme.  And it is.  Why should a starving world subsidize a country that pays a lady in California to have 14 babies? 

.

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___