RE: [RT] Martin Armstrong

["Jim Ross" <jrosscpa@xxxxxxx>]

Yes, I’d been watching the April turn date and trying to fit my thoughts to be consistent with it.  But I’ve been quoting incorrectly as April 15 and now that I re read page 26 it is neither April 14 or 15, but April 16, 2009.  Somewhere in there he indicates he believes it will be a ‘reactionary high’ but I can’t located it and the document can’t be searched.  I believe he was not firm on this point but speculating.

 

From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Don Ewers
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:51 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RT] Martin Armstrong

 

Two Armstrong dates approaching, March 19, 2009 (page 25 of the document) and a "more refined" April 14, 2009 (page 26). Worth watching, but these dates are not necessarily tied to the equity market if you read that section.

 

Attached was from http://seekingalpha.com/article/103613-on-martin-armstrong-s-it-s-just-time 

 

Don Ewers

 

----- Original Message -----

From: hbernst963@xxxxxxx

To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 4:33 PM

Subject: Re: [RT] cyclesman - Tim Wood

 

If you want some cycle analysis, here's some from a guy (now in jail) who predicted last week's top almost 10 years ago. ContraHour: Martin Armstrong's Economic Pi Cycle

 

Howard Bernstein

---

AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.

---

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.413 / Virus Database: 268.18.6/709 - Release Date: 3/3/2007

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___