PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
I will warn one time, keep this kind of crap off the list or I'll remove offenders without further discussion.
Bob
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Mark Simms <marksimms@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wow - you are so smart...can I kiss your ass ?
It is far better to remain silent and be thought a fool rather than speak out and remove all doubt.
None the less, you have opted to speak out. So let me put short shift to your hyperbole.
The SEC is halting NAKED short selling, not short selling. Short selling is a useful and natural feedback mechanism for markets. It is even more so when enforced in conjuction with the uptick rule. Naked shorting OTH is solely for speculation and not for hedging of investment positions. The societal purpose of markets is for investors. Speculators and traders have their place in the market to help provide liquidity. However, naked shorting does not provide any useful or constructive function to markets and will not be missed as it was not missed for the 150+ years it didn't exist in the markets.
Just as margin requirements are a valid and useful market regulator, so are balancing tools such as prohibition of naked shorting.
Boater805
At 05:55 PM 9/18/2008, you wrote:
SEC to halt short selling What would happen if it were: SEC to halt Long Buying
What's the difference ? It is a totally biased action on their part.
__._,_.___
__,_._,___
|