RE: [RT] Re: [TimeandCycles] Low yes, new low hardly

["Adrian Pitt" <apitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

One well respected Elliott analyst is forecasting a potential collapse here for a wave (C). 

You don’t give that much credence Ben?

 

From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ben
Sent: Friday, 27 June 2008 1:51 AM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RT] Re: [TimeandCycles] Low yes, new low hardly

 

yes load the boat

but as always use stops

bought sso

and sold 65 calls july at @2

Ben

----- Original Message -----

From: Ron Cernokus

To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:17 AM

Subject: Re: [RT] Re: [TimeandCycles] Low yes, new low hardly

 

Well another good one Ben.  So are you expecting we now move higher into next week?

 

Ron

----- Original Message -----

From: Ben

To: TimeandCycles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 11:25 PM

Subject: [RT] Re: [TimeandCycles] Low yes, new low hardly

 

Hello Jerry

the bullish divergence is in Both McClellan osc vol and issues

and

the icing on the cake is that new lows are FAR less than march lows

however,

that DOES not mean we spring ahead right away

we should make a lower low monday

and

may make a lower low thersday

(all should be used to accumilate longs)

__._,_.___

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___