|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
My comments and the rule change had nothing to do with anything Tim
posted but rather referred to posts from newer members who were pasting
posts from other web sites. I feel that was clear in my mails on
the topic and doubt Tim construed what I said as referring to anything he
sent. I think his mail saying he is leaving us validates that he
didn't misunderstand me. His feelings are hurt due to the comments
about rumors and that was one member's opinion and most certainly not the
general feeling on this list. Tim's contributions to this list are
invaluable as is his experience and expertise. Now we see the
damage of what one (not well thought out), post can do which is why I
have always stressed consideration for each other as a mainstay of
membership here. I hope Tim will reconsider
Bob
At 09:10 PM 3/25/2008, you wrote:
I
think that was a misstatement. I read it and thought it was referring to
the original post, not your reply.
I cannot imagine anyone here single-handedly reducing the value of your
insightful posts Tim.
Please reconsider.
Regards,
Gene
From: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Timothy
Morge
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 8:49 PM
To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [RT] Re: Articles of Impeachment? Bear Stearns
Buyout Illegal?
Folks on the RT list:
I actually remember the founding of this original
list, and I have been around that long and much longer
and I dare say, I have seen it all, from the inside
and out.
That being said, someone that has posted about seven
times here has brought me to my knees: I apparently am
seen as a 'rumor monger', which has no appeal to me.
I apologize for taking up the list's time these many
years, and I leave you all with the wish that you all
make money and have fun trading.
I bid you a fond farewell.
Best,
Tim Morge
--- LB
<nsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Probably right. It would make little difference if
> I believe them or not.
> Some rumors may become facts, one day.
> When and which ones.
> Anyway one can post what they want. Good or bad.
> It usually goes in one ear and out the other with
> me.
> It ain't like this trouble is something new to us
> or something that just happened.
> I remember bnck when over 1000 banks and S&Ls
> closed. Won't that long ago either. Boy am I
> getting old.
> Wondering if I have seen it all. Not likely.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Code 2
> To: LB
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 9:00 PM
> Subject: Re[2]: [RT] Re: Articles of Impeachment?
> Bear Stearns Buyout Illegal?
>
>
> I agree with Bob's new policy, but frankly, I
> appreciate the "rumors"
> here. I will believe a Tim Morge "rumor" any day
> of the week over the
> garbage spouted by the likes of Bear Stearns execs
> who claim their
> company is rock-solid only a day or so before they
> accept a $2
> takeover bailout.
>
> When the powers line up to say that a company (or
> a Thai Baht or a
> Russian Ruble or some economy) is fundamentally
> sound, I look around
> for reliable rumors while heading for the exit.
>
> From: LB
<nsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Monday, March 24, 2008, 4:31:03 PM
> Subject: [RT] Re: Articles of Impeachment? Bear
> Stearns Buyout Illegal?
>
> Thank you, Thank you, Thak you!
> Also lets try to stay away from the rumor mill.
> Like this bank of company is going broke or this one
> is not.
> Because we don't know.
> Even some of the so called well known workers
> don't know untill they show up for work one morning
> and see a sign on the locked door.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: BobsKC
> To:
realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 2:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Articles of Impeachment?
> Bear Stearns Buyout Illegal?
>
> As of today, we will have a changed
> policy. There will be no further pasting of
> posts from other web sites or mail lists or any
> other publications. If you have an interesting
> site that you sincerely believe would interest
> most of our membership, post the link with a 1 or
> 2 sentence description of what is there. There
> are many, many, people posting information on
> various web sites who have an agenda. (Like the
> hedge funds wrapped up in bsc). If you simply
> say "there is info about topic xyz at
>
www.xyz.information.com which relates to the
> takeover of ibm by bsrus (bb pink)", then people
> can look or skip it. Do NOT paste outside opinions
> here!
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
__._,_.___
![]()
__,_._,___
|