[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] George Friedman's take on the Fed action



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Another related view:


>The Federal Reserve System tried to reshuffle the financial deck 
>late March 16. For the next 24 hours, the global financial markets 
>tried to figure out where the Fed's action left the system. At the 
>end of the day, they were not happy. But at the same time, they were 
>not suicidal. That represents a victory for the Fed.
>
>It is important to understand what the Fed was trying to achieve. In 
>essence, its goal was not complicated. It was trying to manage the 
>collapse of a financial institution -- Bear Stearns -- such that it 
>did not default on its clients, individual and institutional. The 
>threat it faced was of bank failures, in which depositors would lose 
>their savings. If Bear Stearns had been unable to carry out 
>financial transactions on Monday morning because of a lack of cash, 
>its clients effectively would have found their assets frozen. And 
>that would have touched off a ripple through the financial system 
>that might have caused a series of uncontrollable failures.
>
>The Fed did two things to prevent this scenario. First, it 
>engineered a buyout of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan Chase at $2 a share. 
>The Fed was not at all interested in protecting investors in Bear 
>Stearns, who were nearly wiped out. Nor were they interested in 
>protecting Bear Stearns employees. The Fed was interested in having 
>JPMorgan Chase -- a huge bank with a strong balance sheet -- in 
>effect guarantee the liquidity of Bear Stearn's account-holding 
>clients, thus avoiding the threat of falling dominoes.
>
>The Fed's second move was to redefine the rules of access to 
>low-cost, short-term financing from the Federal Reserve. 
>Historically, such financing has been confined to banks. It has now 
>been extended to brokerage houses. By doing this, the major 
>brokerage houses can access money from the Fed for 90 days, up from 
>30. That sets the stage for an orderly consolidation of the system, 
>in which major banks with strong balance sheets use short-term Fed 
>money to acquire weak and failing institutions without having to 
>pull liquidity out of the system by using their own money or trying 
>to borrow money from banks. In effect, the Fed created a situation 
>where other institutions in the same condition as Bear Stearns can 
>be merged into healthier entities without the need for this 
>weekend's urgent scramble.
>
>JPMorgan Chase got a pretty good deal out of the move. For less than 
>a quarter billion dollars, it acquired the marketing strength and 
>customer base of a major financial institution, something that could 
>well be valued in the tens of billions once things settle down. We 
>are not clear on what Bear Stearns' debt structure was but its 
>Manhattan building alone is said to be worth three times what Bear 
>Stearns went for. Obviously there are a lot of liabilities traveling 
>with Bear Stearns, but we suspect that given Fed financing, JPMorgan 
>Chase was not engaging in charitable activity. Indeed, there already 
>are rumors that Bear Stearns' shareholders might resist the 
>takeover. But by the time that happens, if it even does, the deal 
>will be well down the road. In the meantime, its clients were served 
>Monday morning.
>
>The Fed is working to create a system for dealing with weak 
>institutions that neither allows defaults to clients nor sucks 
>liquidity out of the system as acquiring institutions raise money to 
>make acquisitions. Just as the Fed effectively brokered this 
>acquisition, we expect it to be brokering other ones in the coming 
>days and weeks using its new tools. Alternatively, now that it is 
>known that the Fed will protect clients as it would protect bank 
>depositors, there will be fewer failures than otherwise. This is 
>because the kind of pressure that built up on Bear Stearns last week 
>may not happen again.
>
>Those old enough to remember companies like Bache remember similar 
>actions before. What the Fed has done is in fact not unprecedented. 
>What is new is that it now regards brokerage houses and equity 
>markets as being on par with banks and money markets. That is 
>important, but not earthshaking.
>
>The S&P 500 has shed about 20 percent of its value since October 
>2007. In 2000-2001, the S&P fell about 40 percent before beginning 
>to recover -- and the 2001 recession was not a transformative event. 
>It was just another recession and a mild one at that. Obviously, the 
>markets may continue to fall. But we are still struck by how well 
>they are holding up in the face of remarkably negative sentiment and 
>a sense of intense crisis.
>
>We do not predict the market, but we do regard the equity markets as 
>a guide to future behavior of the economy. Given negative sentiment 
>and the failure to fall more than it has, it seems to us that the 
>markets are saying that the liquidity crisis is being managed. For 
>all the apparent gloom, the markets are doing surprisingly well. 
>Between this liquidity crisis, soaring oil prices and the falling 
>dollar, the equity markets are in fact remarkably calm. But that is 
>a leading indicator and it might change on a dime.
>
>We continue to believe that petrodollars and Chinese dollars are 
>stabilizing the American system. And the Fed now has reduced the 
>threat of structural failure of financial institutions. As we have 
>said, a recession is to be expected after six years of expansion. 
>But the latest actions by the Fed strike us as evidence that while a 
>recession may be likely, it won't be catastrophic.



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:realtraders-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:realtraders-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/