PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
JUST TO SAY THAT I THINK YOU'RE RIGHT, BOB, and that this
SIG group is for shared education/information and not for selling
one's experience or system.
If it were we would all drown in many other promoter's of their
systems for a fee.
Ira's comment has some merit and I'd leave it to your judgment Bob
re his offer.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:15
AM
Subject: Re: [RT] For newbies
I expected better from you Clyde. When we had a long standing rule
against any advertising, you stuck your self serving web site url on all your
mails and I said nothing. You made mention of your swing machine often
in your posts and I said nothing. Now, you attack me because I warn
people about the obvious. My motives for what I said are obvious and are
not in any way self serving. The members can decide for themselves about
your comments.
Bob
At 09:17 PM 3/27/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Bob, I think your
comments were ill advised. You came late into this list and
filled a void as a moderator but in that position you should have
"moderated" and not tried to be the "godfather". There are
many of us who provide a service that is more educational than it is
monetarily rewarding. Keep your less than well informed ideas
to yourself and let this list operate openly and without a hammer
hand expressing something that is probably not in the best interest
of the members -- particularly the "newbie" members. I'm not
sure that anyone is a "newbie" but I do know that we have many who can
well accept guidance from those of us who have been around a long
time. If one of these "newbie's" purchases some type of a
"system" that provides them with information that leads to them
finding a method that fits their style of trading then SO BE IT
AND GOOD FOR THEM -- AND THE VENDOR. Clyde
Lee - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - Clyde
Lee
phone: 713.783.9540 SYTECH Corporation 7910 Westglen, Suite
105 Houston, TX 77063 fax:
713.783.1092 WebSite: www.theswingmachine.com -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: BobsKC
- To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
- Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 08:50 PM
- Subject: Re: [RT] For newbies
- You fall into the possible category. You are the reason we can
never say never. You are an honorable man who I would trust above
nearly all others. You are the exception and there are always
exceptions. But, my statements remain valid in spite of you.
:))
- Bob
- At 03:08 PM 3/27/2007 -0700, you wrote:
- I fall into the reasonable category. I
retired off of the options floor in 1985. Traded up stairs and
then at home. Trading is like a narcotic for me and very difficult
to stop. I had a heart attach and the doctor said no more
trading. Several months later someone I knew contacted me.
He couldn't make a living and asked me to teach him to trade. I
was reluctant to give out the system, but I said yes. To this day
that party can't trade but he does write a successful news letter and
does some teaching. I found that I liked teaching and have
continued. The majority of people that come here do so based upon
a referral from someone else who has been here. Are all the
students that leave here successful? No. In any field of
endeavor, is everyone who tries it successful and the answer to that is
still no. The statistics seem to indicate that 90% of new
ventures fail. My success rate has been just the reverse of
that. So there are some of us who do teach for reasons other
than those given in your post. I still follow the markets, I
still teach a little and I post a blog on a daily basis. There is
some vacation time in there also.
- Ira
- www.thetradersguide.net
- From: BobsKC
- To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
- Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:48 PM
- Subject: Re: [RT] For newbies
- It's possible there could be a legitimate reason but it is also
possible that someone could throw darts at a stock list and make a huge
amount of money. ie: *Anything* is *possible* but the
question is, how likely is it? We must all make decisions based on
the probability of things and not on the possibility of things. As
an advocate of methodologies, you surely would agree with this
statement.
- Bob
- At 12:48 PM 3/27/2007 -0700, you wrote:
- Bob,
- Generally I agree with the content of your
post, especially concerning those methods that are actively sold
through mass advertising or direct mail. However, there may be
legitimate reasons for making a new technology available to others.
Have you ever heard of The Prediction Company? After developing a
superior trading methodology based on nonlinear dynamic modeling, this
group of scientists sold it to a major bank. This group had divergent
interest and wished to pursue other activities. (Read "The Predictors"
by Thomas Bass.) Was this a legitimate reason to sell?
- Let's take another example. Active traders
know that it is a time consuming and often stressful occupation.
Suppose an individual developed an outstanding methodology and traded
it successfully for a number of years before being advised, for health
reasons, to reduce his activity. Would the desire to extract a stream
of income from the methodology without the day-to- day trading
activity be a legitimate reason to sell it to others?
- And there is the issue of scale. Suppose
the same individual above traded a six figure portfolio successfully
for a number of years using a break-through technology. Then he was
offered an opportunity to apply it to a hundred million dollar fund.
Would it be a legitimate reason to sell?
- So, perhaps you can agree that there may
be legitimate reasons for making new technology available to others.
As always a buyer should exercise due diligence but it is the value of
the product which should be questioned - not the motivation of the
seller.
-
- Best Regards,
-
- Jim
- ----- Original Message -----
- From: BobsKC
- To: realtraders@yahoogroups.com
- Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 11:18 AM
- Subject: [RT] For newbies
- Some time ago, I changed the rules on our list to allow
advertising as long
- as it didn't get out of hand and there was no pumping. I am
pleased to say
- that it has not gotten out of hand and has been minimal and
- professional. Still, it is only a matter of common sense to think
about
- trading systems and stock picking systems. If the person promoting
their
- product really had a holy grail of trading, why would they need to
sell it
- to you? Put another way, if you have the combination to the safe,
why sell
- it to someone else? Just go in there and get all the gold you
want, when
- you want. Selling the combination only puts people in your line of
access
- and redefines how much gold there is to split since nothing is in
endless
- supply.
- Having said that, I do not doubt the validity of those who are
trying to
- sell trading systems. I only doubt the need to do it if their
systems work
- so well. You should ask yourself these same questions before you
begin
- writing checks.
- Hope everyone has a great trading week.
- Bob
__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
__,_._,___
|
|