Ben:
Long term the target price is still 13250 with an
interim target of 12200 which I believe we have just reached. there should
be resistance at this level. There are 2 more price objectives above here 12360
and 12650. These are all on long term charts. The major problem with
trading very long term charts is that price can go down to 9700 and you would
still be in the primary up move. That is quite a hit to take to prove to
your ego that you are right.
On shorter term charts I have support at 12000 and
it seems to be holding for now. Price is currently in a move down. I had a
short term target low of 12003 which should hold as support for a short
time. Price is in a little longer cycle down move that has a price
objective of 11900 +/-. I don't see a strong up move at this time and the Dow
would have to take out 12230 to have any chance for a intermediate rally. Today
that doesn't seem to be a possibility.
I have been following the Dow this week at www.thetradersguide.net and I
will continue until Friday. Next week I will follow something else.
Any suggestions? Have a good weekend Ben.
Thanks Ira.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:18
AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Fw: [AAQuants] 3 signs
that a stock crash is coming
Ira
back 6 month ago you said you can see over 13000,
congratulations on a great call,,!!!
where do you see short term we are going
and where longer term?
best regards
Ben
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 1:49
AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Fw: [AAQuants] 3
signs that a stock crash is coming
I have found that it doesn't make any
difference about the fundamentals, the PE ratios, or anything else. It
is all on the chart. You can have 2 companies with the exact same
fundamentals and one can be trading at twice the price of the other.
One is followed and the other has a set of officers that doesn't talk nice
to the analysts. As long as the chart says higher that is where it is
going. If the chart says lower it will go there. The problem
comes in what each trader sees in the chart. Like a painting or a
woman. It is all in the eye of the beholder.
Good trading, Ira.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006
9:46 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Fw: [AAQuants] 3
signs that a stock crash is coming
Dunno Ben .. we can all make any case we wish with numbers but he says
nothing about PE's being in line or that earnings are fantastic and
growing or that interest rates are historically low or that the NASDAQ is
still down 60% from the high. Technicals are important but no more
so than fundamentals and at least with fundamentals, the facts are the
facts and not manipulated forecasts by manipulating the numbers. The
fact that there are heavy shorts in the indices is bullish in my
opinion. Still, I appreciate all you share with this list and with
all of us. You are most generous to do so.
Bob
At
11:55 PM 11/1/2006 -0500, you wrote:
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:groups-email-trad Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_/jrmDsn210rp4MbVYTFCxw)"
Sent:
Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:41 PM Subject: [AAQuants] 3
signs that a stock crash is coming
By Michael Brush What a
great time to own stocks.
Three major indicators with strong
track records are signaling it's time to sell stocks. Here's how
they work and why investors should worry.
The Dow Jones
Industrial Average ($INDU) is setting records just about every day.
The S&P 500 Index ($INX) has advanced 12% in less than five
months. Technology stocks are up about 14% since midsummer.
The giddy stock bulls may be in for a nasty surprise. They're
ignoring three trusty stock-market indicators -- with great records
for predicting corrections -- that currently are saying it's time to
get out of equities. The signals are closely watched by market
technicians on the lookout for hints that the bull run is getting
tired.
One of the indicators says stocks are simply
expensive compared with other investment options available to big
money managers. Another says that mutual fund managers have mostly
exhausted the supply of dollars they have available to put into the
market. And the third says that the smartest investors are now
betting on a downturn. Together, these harbingers paint a far
different picture of the market than do the raw return
numbers.
Here's a closer look at these indicators and why you
should be cautious with stocks now.
The stock-bond trade-off
Money managers chiefly put money in two assets: stocks and bonds.
One way of deciding whether stocks are expensive is by comparing
their performance to that of bonds. If bonds lag while stocks
advance, according to some market watchers, fund managers will be
more likely to sell stocks and buy bonds.
But how do you
compare the prices of stocks to bonds? Jason Goepfert of
SentimenTrader.com looks at the performance of the largest bond
and stock indexes as they are embodied by two exchange-traded mutual
funds -- the Standard & Poor's Depositary Receipts (SPY, news,
msgs), which tracks the S&P 500 Index, and the iShares Lehman
20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund (TLT, news, msgs), which tracks 20-year
government bonds. (For data that predates the funds, he compares the
S&P 500 with the 10-year Treasury bond.)
To compare them,
Goepfert contrasts the current ratio of the SPY to the TLT with the
average ratio over the past three months. Since the ratio typically
doesn't change much in 90 days, the two values should be about the
same. Now, though, with the recent rally in stocks, there's a big
gap. The current ratio has moved up to 1.58, compared with an
average of 1.5 over the past 90 days. That may not sound like much.
But since the ratio usually stays fairly constant in any 90-day
period, this is a huge move compared with what normally happens.
The difference between the current gap and the 90-day average is
at a level seen only 1% of the time. (For you statistical wonks, the
indexes are now more than three standard deviations away from the
norm). "Stocks are rarely as overvalued to bonds as they are now,"
says Goepfert.
In the three months after such an extreme
reading, the performance of the S&P 500 has ranged from a loss
of 8.7% to a gain of just 1.7%. That's a bad outlook for the bulls.
It gets worse: This indicator has called two of the biggest market
declines in the past decade.
It flashed red just before the
big correction that started in March 2000, signaling the end of the
technology bubble. By the end of 2002, the S&P 500 had fallen
more than 45%. (On the upside, this model said buy in mid-2002, just
before the start of the current bull rally.)
On July 17,
1998, the model said sell just before a dramatic crash that took the
S&P 500 down 19% in the next month and a half. On Aug. 31 that
year, the model said buy just before a September rally that took the
market up 11% in a month.
Cash-strapped mutual funds Mutual
funds are allowed to hold cash instead of stocks or bonds. How much
cash they have on hand is often a good signal of where the market is
heading. If they have a lot of cash, it means there's still a lot of
money left to go into stocks. When cash levels are low, it means
there's less money on the sidelines to drive stocks higher. It also
means that if retail investors get scared and sell their fund
shares, fund managers will have to sell stock to meet redemptions,
driving stock prices lower.
As of the end of August, U.S. equity
mutual funds had 4.4% of their assets in cash, according to the
Investment Company Institute. Goepfert adjusts this number for how
much cash they should have on hand given the current level of
interest rates. Even though interest rates are relatively low,
Goepfert figures that funds should have a 7% cash position,
according to historical trends. This means funds have 2.5% less cash
than they "should" have, given the level of short-term interest
rates. This is another historic extreme.
Since 1950, whenever
cash shortfalls hit these lows, the S&P 500 has fallen 69% of
the time with an average decline of 4%. Ominously, the last two
times cash levels were this low, bad things happened to stocks. Cash
levels hit these lows in early 2000 just ahead of the last big bear
market. Cash also hit current levels in early 1981 just before a
two-year market slump.
The smart money is bearish Investors,
of course, always want to know what the "smart money" is doing. To
figure this out, Goepfert turns to the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
First, a primer on futures contracts. Traders who
own futures contracts on a stock index like the S&P 500 have
purchased the S&P 500 stocks at a price agreed upon now, for
delivery at some point in the future. Usually these contracts are
settled in cash, without delivery of the underlying
stocks.
To keep track of the futures markets, the CFTC makes
brokers report client positions. The CFTC designates the biggest
traders -- those holding more than 1,000 S&P 500 futures
contracts -- as "commercial" traders. They only make the grade if
they hold those futures contracts as a part of a hedge to protect
against losses in underlying investment positions. Goepfert
considers these commercial traders to be the "smart money." (The
other two categories are big speculators, who hold 1,000 or more
S&P 500 futures contracts that aren't part of a hedged position,
and small speculators, who hold less than 1,000 contracts.)
Right now, commercial traders have a $30 billion net short
position in futures on the S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrial
Average and the Nasdaq Composite Index ($COMPX). Going short is a
bet against the market. Traders go short by borrowing securities and
selling them, hoping they will be able to replace them later at a
cheaper price after a market decline.
This is only the third
time in recent history that this short position has been so large.
The other two times were early 2001, just before the S&P 500
tumbled 38%, and November 2004, after which the market rose some
more and then corrected in early 2005.
A ray of sunshine
Taken together, these three indicators say its time to be more
cautious with stocks -- but they don't mean that a sharp correction
is 100% certain.
Here's just one dissenting voice: Robert
Froehlich, chairman of the investor strategy committee at DWS
Scudder, the U.S. mutual fund division of Deutsche Bank. Froehlich
points out we are moving into the seasonally bullish phase for
stocks. This is the six months from early November to the end of
April, a period Froehlich calls "turkey to tax time." Since 1950,
the average return of the S&P 500 during this phase has been 9%.
The average return of the S&P 500 during the other six months of
the year was only 2.71%.
At the time of publication, Michael
Brush did not own or control any of the equities mentioned in this
portfolio.
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.22/512 - Release
Date: 11/1/2006
No virus found in this outgoing
message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus
Database: 268.13.22/512 - Release Date: 11/1/2006
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.21/511 - Release
Date: 11/1/06
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.23/513 - Release Date:
11/2/2006
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.23/513 - Release Date:
11/2/06
__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
__,_._,___
|