[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Re: Advertising



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I understand your position.  I teach as do some others on this list.  I don't post charts because my system is proprietary.  I do post some of the results of the system from time to time when I feel that it might help someone look at a situation in a little different manner.  If some of Bens rules were implemented I could not post, because I  wouldn't post a chart.
 
I don't sell software, books or anything else that pertains to trading.  I appreciate the no spam policy as I get enough unwanted e-mail without the spam. 
 
I would like to see you continue to post.  I don't use your information, but it does stimulate my mind and causes me to look at things that I might not seek out on my own.  There is something to be learned every day.  Even from the myriad of stock hustlers that send those beautiful pamphlets in the mail.  When I get 10 Pamphlets touting penny gold stocks I start to look for a short in gold.  So there might be some benefit even from spammers who use snail mail .
 
Have a good week all.  Ira.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Advertising

Earl and other RT members:

In no way did I intend to start or contribute to this vast amount of
bandwidth discussing this non-trading issue.

The ONLY forum I posted the announcement to, other than my own, was RT,
because I have been a member since the very beginning and a handful of
people had recently privately emailed me asking me what the heck happened
to me. In no way did I intend what I posted to be spam or solicitation of
any product or firm.

I am saddened that I have now been labeled a "spammer" on this list. That
being said, I understand Bob's concern for having control of a forum that
he runs, and I know how difficult it is to "put the genie back in the
bottle," so I defer to his judgement. I thought I had done a good job
"cleansing the message I posted and apparently, I was wrong. If I offended
any of you, you have my sincere apologies.

Because of the business involvements that fill my days [and generally, half
my nights] it is very difficult to discuss trading in any sense without
touching on some concept, site or product I use in my business activities,
so the filtering has become near impossible for me--maybe it's easy for
others. I'm just being blatantly honest.

Often, when I want to chime in, I hold off because I can't post a chart on
a specific piece of software, etc. So rather than cross what may be the
"line," I just stand back and watch. Honestly, I think myself and many
others are in the same boat and would contribute, but do not or cannot,
because we don't want to cross the line but are so entwined with what we
use that to post without showing what we use would be pointless and,
truthfully, take 250 percent longer to post, with less content.

But, the important thing, one more time.: After ready Earl's post, it
strikes me that my judgement was apparently incorrect. I apologize for the
post. I hope you all go back to discussing trading under the rules your
moderator sets for you.

Best,

Tim Morge




At 05:24 PM 9/27/2005, you wrote:
>This discussion appears to have been brought about by a post from Tim
>Morge for whom I have great respect. Tim contributes a great deal to his
>own Median Line forum, however Tim does not post to this newgroup. I
>thought that the "Open Letter to MedianLine Readers" belonged on the
>MedianLine newsgroup.
>
>I suggest that spammers continue to be shot on sight and that a tight
>reign be maintained on advertising and self promotion ... the last deluge
>of self promotion from Ron Janesch is a good example of what is properly
>banned from this newsgroup.
>
>I think that newsgroup members should be permitted to discuss products
>and/or services in the context of trading discussions. A "setup" for such
>discussions should result in bannishment.
>
>I would continue to permit the kind of text signature used by Clyde Lee
>but nothing more obvious or detailed ... banner ads should not be tolerated.
>
>Earl
>
>
>----------
>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>    *  Visit your group
> "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders>realtraders" on the web.
>    *
>    *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>    *
> <mailto:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>    *
>    *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
>----------



YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS