| 
 I understand your position.  I teach as do 
some others on this list.  I don't post charts because my system is 
proprietary.  I do post some of the results of the system from time to time 
when I feel that it might help someone look at a situation in a little different 
manner.  If some of Bens rules were implemented I could not post, because 
I  wouldn't post a chart.  
  
I don't sell software, books or anything else that 
pertains to trading.  I appreciate the no spam policy as I get enough 
unwanted e-mail without the spam.   
  
I would like to see you continue to post.  I 
don't use your information, but it does stimulate my mind and causes me to look 
at things that I might not seek out on my own.  There is something to be 
learned every day.  Even from the myriad of stock hustlers that send those 
beautiful pamphlets in the mail.  When I get 10 Pamphlets touting penny 
gold stocks I start to look for a short in gold.  So there might be some 
benefit even from spammers who use snail mail .  
  
Have a good week all.  Ira.  
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:54 
  PM 
  Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Advertising 
  
  Earl and other RT members:
  In no way did I intend to 
  start or contribute to this vast amount of  bandwidth discussing this 
  non-trading issue.
  The ONLY forum I posted the announcement to, other 
  than my own, was RT,  because I have been a member since the very beginning 
  and a handful of  people had recently privately emailed me asking me what 
  the heck happened  to me. In no way did I intend what I posted to be spam 
  or solicitation of  any product or firm.
  I am saddened that I have 
  now been labeled a "spammer" on this list. That  being said, I understand 
  Bob's concern for having control of a forum that  he runs, and I know how 
  difficult it is to "put the genie back in the  bottle," so I defer to his 
  judgement. I thought I had done a good job  "cleansing the message I posted 
  and apparently, I was wrong. If I offended  any of you, you have my sincere 
  apologies.
  Because of the business involvements that fill my days [and 
  generally, half  my nights] it is very difficult to discuss trading in any 
  sense without  touching on some concept, site or product I use in my 
  business activities,  so the filtering has become near impossible for 
  me--maybe it's easy for  others. I'm just being blatantly 
  honest.
  Often, when I want to chime in, I hold off because I can't post 
  a chart on  a specific piece of software, etc. So rather than cross what 
  may be the  "line," I just stand back and watch. Honestly, I think myself 
  and many  others are in the same boat and would contribute, but do not or 
  cannot,  because we don't want to cross the line but are so entwined with 
  what we  use that to post without showing what we use would be pointless 
  and,  truthfully, take 250 percent longer to post, with less 
  content.
  But, the important thing, one more time.: After ready Earl's 
  post, it  strikes me that my judgement was apparently incorrect. I 
  apologize for the  post. I hope you all go back to discussing trading under 
  the rules your  moderator sets for you.
  Best,
  Tim 
  Morge
 
 
 
  At 05:24 PM 9/27/2005, you wrote: >This 
  discussion appears to have been brought about by a post from Tim  >Morge 
  for whom I have great respect. Tim contributes a great deal to his  >own 
  Median Line forum, however Tim does not post to this newgroup. I 
   >thought that the "Open Letter to MedianLine Readers" belonged on the 
   >MedianLine newsgroup. > >I suggest that spammers continue 
  to be shot on sight and that a tight  >reign be maintained on 
  advertising and self promotion ... the last deluge  >of self promotion 
  from Ron Janesch is a good example of what is properly  >banned from 
  this newsgroup. > >I think that newsgroup members should be 
  permitted to discuss products  >and/or services in the context of 
  trading discussions. A "setup" for such  >discussions should result in 
  bannishment. > >I would continue to permit the kind of text 
  signature used by Clyde Lee  >but nothing more obvious or detailed ... 
  banner ads should not be 
  tolerated. > >Earl > > >---------- >YAHOO! 
  GROUPS LINKS > >    *  Visit your group 
   > "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders>realtraders" 
  on the web. >    * >    *  To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >    * 
   > 
  <mailto:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
   > >    * >    *  Your 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the  > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! 
  Terms of Service. > > >----------
  
  
 
  
    
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
 
 
    
  |