[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Tim Morge's course study



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

--- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Joe Duffy" <keypoint@xxxx> wrote:
> The Morge post is exactly why the whole idea of banning is 
retarded. Why
> would anyone object to this type of info from Morge? Really why???
> 
> Where the hell would any of us be without Welles Wilder. Larry 
Williams, Sam
> Tennis, Murray Rugerio, etc etc etc. Everyone here got knowledge 
from those
> that went before them. Just because now you think you have enough 
knowledge
> is no reason to deprive those coming after you.
> 
> It can't possibly hurt anyone, but post like Morges may help a lot 
of
> others. Again why would anyone want to ban this type of help for 
others???
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Timothy Morge" <timothymorge@xxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 7:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Advertising
> 
> 
> > Earl and other RT members:
> >
> > In no way did I intend to start or contribute to this vast amount 
of
> > bandwidth discussing this non-trading issue.
> >
> > The ONLY forum I posted the announcement to, other than my own, 
was RT,
> > because I have been a member since the very beginning and a 
handful of
> > people had recently privately emailed me asking me what the heck 
happened
> > to me. In no way did I intend what I posted to be spam or 
solicitation of
> > any product or firm.
> >
> > I am saddened that I have now been labeled a "spammer" on this 
list. That
> > being said, I understand Bob's concern for having control of a 
forum that
> > he runs, and I know how difficult it is to "put the genie back in 
the
> > bottle," so I defer to his judgement. I thought I had done a good 
job
> > "cleansing the message I posted and apparently, I was wrong. If I 
offended
> > any of you, you have my sincere apologies.
> >
> > Because of the business involvements that fill my days [and 
generally,
> half
> > my nights] it is very difficult to discuss trading in any sense 
without
> > touching on some concept, site or product I use in my business 
activities,
> > so the filtering has become near impossible for me--maybe it's 
easy for
> > others. I'm just being blatantly honest.
> >
> > Often, when I want to chime in, I hold off because I can't post a 
chart on
> > a specific piece of software, etc. So rather than cross what may 
be the
> > "line," I just stand back and watch. Honestly, I think myself and 
many
> > others are in the same boat and would contribute, but do not or 
cannot,
> > because we don't want to cross the line but are so entwined with 
what we
> > use that to post without showing what we use would be pointless 
and,
> > truthfully, take 250 percent longer to post, with less content.
> >
> > But, the important thing, one more time.: After ready Earl's 
post, it
> > strikes me that my judgement was apparently incorrect. I 
apologize for the
> > post. I hope you all go back to discussing trading under the 
rules your
> > moderator sets for you.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Tim Morge
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 05:24 PM 9/27/2005, you wrote:
> > >This discussion appears to have been brought about by a post 
from Tim
> > >Morge for whom I have great respect. Tim contributes a great 
deal to his
> > >own Median Line forum, however Tim does not post to this 
newgroup. I
> > >thought that the "Open Letter to MedianLine Readers" belonged on 
the
> > >MedianLine newsgroup.
> > >
> > >I suggest that spammers continue to be shot on sight and that a 
tight
> > >reign be maintained on advertising and self promotion ... the 
last deluge
> > >of self promotion from Ron Janesch is a good example of what is 
properly
> > >banned from this newsgroup.
> > >
> > >I think that newsgroup members should be permitted to discuss 
products
> > >and/or services in the context of trading discussions. A "setup" 
for such
> > >discussions should result in bannishment.
> > >
> > >I would continue to permit the kind of text signature used by 
Clyde Lee
> > >but nothing more obvious or detailed ... banner ads should not be
> tolerated.
> > >
> > >Earl
> > >
> > >
> > >----------
> > >YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> > >
> > >    *  Visit your group
> > > "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders>realtraders" on the 
web.
> > >    *
> > >    *  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > >    *
> > >
> <mailto:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?
subject=Unsubscribe>realtrad
> ers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >    *
> > >    *  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> > >
> > >
> > >----------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Has anyone taken Tim's course study? I'd appreciate some feedback 
as it looks interesting...

Thanks, 

RJS1948@xxxxxxx




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Try Online Currency Trading with GFT. Free 50K Demo. Trade 
24 Hours. Commission-Free. 
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RvFikB/9M2KAA/U1CZAA/zMEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/