|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Yes lets milk Clyde for info, but lets not let anyone know Clyde can help
them in their trading with some of the products he sells for TS. Clyde is
one of the few guys who is willing to give something just because he is a
gentlemen. He should be able to say after his post that it was drawn with
XYZ program available for TS by Clyde Lee.
----- Original Message -----
From: "JHP" <jan4123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Advertising
> Tim,
> ," I just stand back and watch. Honestly, I think myself and many
> others are in the same boat and would contribute, but do not or cannot,
> because we don't want to cross the line but are so entwined with what we
> use that to post without showing what we use would be pointless and,
> truthfully, take 250 percent longer to post, with less content."
>
> Why not show it the way Clyde does it with his products? Show it a number
> of times in a current action if it's different than what is at your
website.
> Jan Philipp
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Timothy Morge" <timothymorge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 4:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Advertising
>
>
> > Earl and other RT members:
> >
> > In no way did I intend to start or contribute to this vast amount of
> > bandwidth discussing this non-trading issue.
> >
> > The ONLY forum I posted the announcement to, other than my own, was RT,
> > because I have been a member since the very beginning and a handful of
> > people had recently privately emailed me asking me what the heck
happened
> > to me. In no way did I intend what I posted to be spam or solicitation
of
> > any product or firm.
> >
> > I am saddened that I have now been labeled a "spammer" on this list.
That
> > being said, I understand Bob's concern for having control of a forum
that
> > he runs, and I know how difficult it is to "put the genie back in the
> > bottle," so I defer to his judgement. I thought I had done a good job
> > "cleansing the message I posted and apparently, I was wrong. If I
offended
> > any of you, you have my sincere apologies.
> >
> > Because of the business involvements that fill my days [and generally,
> > half
> > my nights] it is very difficult to discuss trading in any sense without
> > touching on some concept, site or product I use in my business
activities,
> > so the filtering has become near impossible for me--maybe it's easy for
> > others. I'm just being blatantly honest.
> >
> > Often, when I want to chime in, I hold off because I can't post a chart
on
> > a specific piece of software, etc. So rather than cross what may be the
> > "line," I just stand back and watch. Honestly, I think myself and many
> > others are in the same boat and would contribute, but do not or cannot,
> > because we don't want to cross the line but are so entwined with what we
> > use that to post without showing what we use would be pointless and,
> > truthfully, take 250 percent longer to post, with less content.
> >
> > But, the important thing, one more time.: After ready Earl's post, it
> > strikes me that my judgement was apparently incorrect. I apologize for
the
> > post. I hope you all go back to discussing trading under the rules your
> > moderator sets for you.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Tim Morge
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 05:24 PM 9/27/2005, you wrote:
> >>This discussion appears to have been brought about by a post from Tim
> >>Morge for whom I have great respect. Tim contributes a great deal to his
> >>own Median Line forum, however Tim does not post to this newgroup. I
> >>thought that the "Open Letter to MedianLine Readers" belonged on the
> >>MedianLine newsgroup.
> >>
> >>I suggest that spammers continue to be shot on sight and that a tight
> >>reign be maintained on advertising and self promotion ... the last
deluge
> >>of self promotion from Ron Janesch is a good example of what is properly
> >>banned from this newsgroup.
> >>
> >>I think that newsgroup members should be permitted to discuss products
> >>and/or services in the context of trading discussions. A "setup" for
such
> >>discussions should result in bannishment.
> >>
> >>I would continue to permit the kind of text signature used by Clyde Lee
> >>but nothing more obvious or detailed ... banner ads should not be
> >>tolerated.
> >>
> >>Earl
> >>
> >>
> >>----------
> >>YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >>
> >> * Visit your group
> >> "<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders>realtraders" on the web.
> >> *
> >> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >> *
> >>
<mailto:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>realtrad
ers-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> *
> >> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the
> >> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> >>
> >>
> >>----------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Try Online Currency Trading with GFT. Free 50K Demo. Trade
24 Hours. Commission-Free.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RvFikB/9M2KAA/U1CZAA/zMEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|