[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RT] Parallel moves



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

I really don't have anything else to add I'm afraid...........Chas
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael S.
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: [RT] Parallel moves

Hi Charles,

thanks for your interesting contribution. It seems to describe a different phenomenon, though. I don't see how it can explain the fact that stocks and energies are positively correlated. Care to elaborate?

Best regards,
Michael Suesserott


Charles Meyer wrote:
> Michael-

> How about this explanation?
> ======================
>
> 5/15/05  - From Charles Meyer
>
> Take a look at BMNIX in FastTrack.  That fund invests 50% of it's
> portfolio in long positions and 50% of it's portfolio in short positions
> which translates into pretty much of a market neutral/non-directional
> posture.
>
>
> The idea is that when the market is strong the stocks in which they are
> 50% long will rise MORE than the purported weak stocks in which they are
> 50% short.  And when the market is weak; they believe the stocks in
> which they are 50% short will decline more than the purported strong
> stocks in which they are 50% long.
>
> However; look at their performance during April and May.  As can be seen
> the fund has been declining in price in spite of the fact 50% of the
> dollars are in short positions?  How can this be so?  Quite simply; it's
> the nature of a bear market.  While there may be individual stocks which
> appear attractive to hold and may even be demonstrating strength
> relative to the overall list; the bulls are anxious to protect profits
> when those stocks start to fall with the market.  This leads to a domino
> effect where mutual funds--faced with liquidations--are also forced to
> sell stocks:  even the attractive ones.  You will note that BMNIX tends
> to do well when the general market is fairing poorly.  But; there comes
> a point to where the stocks in which they are long decline more than do
> the stocks in which they are short.  I'm not sure this is a good or even
> an adequate explanation of why this occurs; but the end result is that
> even perfect hedging market neutral will lose money in a bear market. 
> For related reasons; of course all those hedge funds will have an
> adverse effect on stocks in a game which can be likened to musical
> chairs where too much money is attempting to exploit similar strategies
> and system edges.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> =================
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>     *From:* Michael S. <mailto:MikeSuesserott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     *To:* realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:34 PM
>     *Subject:* Re: [RT] Parallel moves
>
>     I am aware of the phenomenon. What I am hoping for is some
>     fundamental insight as to *why* the two markets behave that way.
>     Being an option trader, measuring correlations is part of my
>     routine. And the said correlation has been unusually strong lately,
>     in several time frames.
>
>     Although I never trade on fundamentals alone, I would still be
>     interested in the economical basis for this occurrence, and would be
>     grateful if someone could come up with a fundamentally-oriented
>     explanation.
>
>     Best regards,
>     Michael Suesserott
>
>
>     Ron Cernokus wrote:
>      > These two markets often turn together.  Look at March, April and may.
>      >
>      >
>      >     ----- Original Message -----
>      >     *From:* Michael S. <mailto:MikeSuesserott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>      >     *To:* realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     <mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      >     *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:13 PM
>      >     *Subject:* [RT] Parallel moves
>      >
>      >     For some time now, SPY and XLE (Energy Select Spyder)have been
>      >     moving in tandem, even on 5min. charts. Any ideas as to the
>      >     fundamental reason behind this phenomenon? Shouldn't these
>     markets
>      >     be inversely correlated, if at all? I.e., shouldn't stocks go
>     down
>      >     when energy becomes more expensive?
>      >
>      >     Best regards,
>      >     Michael suesserott
>      >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Yahoo! Groups Links*
>
>     * To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/
>       
>     * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>       <mailto:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Unsubscribe>
>       
>     * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
>       Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.0 - Release Date: 5/30/2005


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Tcy2bD/SOnJAA/cosFAA/zMEolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/realtraders/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 6/1/2005



Yahoo! Groups Links

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.0 - Release Date: 6/1/2005