[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RT] Re: Fed supporting market



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Who 
knows what might happen if there was no support mechanisms....I dont think the 
answer is really that hard to work out.  It would be a vicious world...many 
firms would go belly up..many people would become unemployed, but life 
would go on....there would be enormous short term hardship for those 
unprepared.  But out of destruction would come new growth...just like after 
a fire rages through a forest....capitalism works...support or no 
support...
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2> 
<FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff 
size=2>Adrian
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  
  <FONT 
  face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----From: p8 
  [mailto:pwh112358@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2003 
  3:14 PMTo: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSubject: [RT] Re: 
  Fed supporting marketThe idea does give a warm and 
  fuzzy feeling.  In reality the so-called free market can't seem 
  to stay 100% free for a long time without being intervened sooner or later 
  by the government.  The "free" market tends to behave in a 
  pendulum-like fashion, swinging perpetually from left to right (too much 
  intervension vs no intervension) and passing that center point only in 
  a fleeting moment.Could you provide a lasting, real-life example of a 
  100% free, unadulterated market? -p8 --- In 
  realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Code 2 <Code2@xxxx> 
  wrote:>...<snip>...> > A free and unencumbered 
  market can do a better job of deciding who should thrive and who 
  shouldn't....<snip>...> > 
  >   ----- Original Message ----- >   From: 
  Dan Goncharoff >   To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  >   Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:44 
  AM>   Subject: Re: [RT] Re: Fed supporting market> 
  > >   Because the purpose of the government is to 
  ensure that the market exists the next day. That is why liquidity is 
  provided.> >   As you yourself point out, some players 
  went bankrupt, even a big bank, and survived. As you also point out, the 
  market stopped functioning, and there was no way to hedge.> 
  >   The specialists with negative balances were deciding to 
  commit yet more capital, in a situation where they taken significant 
  losses already, to 'provide a bottom'. How did they know it was the right 
  decision to buy when they did? They were taking yet more risk, and 
  could have been wrong.> >   
  Regards>   DanG> > > 
  >   Ira wrote:> >  During the Crash of 87 
  there were futures, the S&P was traded and options> on futures 
  as well as the OEX.  As for being bankrupt, many broker 
  dealers> on the NYSE as well a market makers on the NASDAQ and on 
  the options floors> and Specialists were carrying negative 
  balances.  In fact a bank in Chicago> did finally go belly 
  up.  There were many that didn't get the benefit of> that very 
  favorable government loan treatment and lost millions on that day.> 
  I personally know of one person that lost $80 million and another who 
  lost> $20 million in a couple of hours.  To lose a million on that 
  day was no big> trick.  There was no way to hedge because 
  every time you went to hedge they> would stop trading that 
  item.  With unlimited borrowing power many> specialist firms were 
  allowed to stay in business with negative balances and> provide a 
  bottom to that market.  Options on the OEX that were almost 
  100> points out of the money were quoted  as high as $65 and there 
  were no> sellers for several hours.   What happened to 
  the American way then?  Why> not let those that took the 
  unlimited risk go the way they should, bankrupt,> and those that 
  did have limited risk or those that were short reap the full> 
  benefit of their positions?  Once again the government stepped in to 
  protect> the privileged and the political favoritism goes on.  
  Will the Fed and Bush> let the Dow go to 5000 in an election 
  year?  How much pressure is placed> upon the Fed by the party 
  in power?  No one really knows except those in> power.  
  All I can relay is what I have seen happen.  The rest is just 
  guess> work by those trying to find a reason.> To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT 









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.