[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] TO OPTION OR NOT TO OPTION



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




Dom1,
 
  I hope you don't mind my jumping in.  
My thinking is that the more variables there
are, the more variables there are with 
which you have to compete or beat professionals at.  <FONT 
face=Arial size=2>Options are a good example of a sophisticated vehicle which 
begs for the best state of the art computer and 
mathematical models.  I was a market maker on the CBOE for 12 years.  
I know enough to know that it is very difficult to compete with the floor 
professional in options, which is why I now seldom trade options in favor of the 
more simplistic futures contracts.   Futures represent mostly a binary 
decision, will it go up or down, to buy or to sell, whereas options represent a 
plethora of variables and required decisions. The greater the number of 
variables, the greater the chance that I will make a bad decision or 
judgement.  So, unless you have a staff of people to run 
the computers, do the research,  and the latest option 
theoretical math model, you are probably gonna get your butt kicked.  It is 
hard enough to make money in the market via getting the underlying market right 
without having to worry about illiquid options causing wide bid - asks, implied 
volatility, the history of option valuation, deltas, thetas and the rest of the 
Greek alphabet.  Bottomline, I am a strong believer in KEEP IT SIMPLE and 
options don't fit my KEEP IT SIMPLE model.   That's my two cents. 

 
Regards,
 
Norman
 
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  dom1_1998 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:42 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [RT] Minimum price 
  increment
  On one hand I agree about calculating option prices via the 
  BS method.On the other hand I wonder how much of a difference does it 
  really make.The MM decides the B/A prices so they're going to be what 
  they areregardless of what the BS model says.  Like you said, over 
  price foryou, under price for me. To avoid this guessing game, I 
  wonder if the best method is buy/selldeltas of one to mesh with the 
  underlying.What do you 
  think?Dominick--- In 
  realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ira" <mr.ira@xxxx> wrote:> I hope 
  that your system includes the theoretical price of theoptions and a 
  realistic way of acquiring the numbers to be used in thevariables in 
  option pricing.  Based upon your reply you are basingyour bid/offer 
  upon someone else's information, bid/offer.  Thegreatest risk outside 
  of price movement in trading options isvolatility risk. So you had better 
  have a handle on finding thevolatility of the underlying and being able to 
  compare it with theimplied volatility of the options.  To know 
  whether the bids andoffers are over or under valued is imperative in 
  trading options. Onething to remember is that your overvalued options 
  might be my undervalued option.  It is all in the numbers used in the 
  option pricingvariables. Good luck in your search.  
  Ira.>   ----- Original Message ----- >   
  From: Brendan B. Boerner >   To: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  >   Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:27 AM>   
  Subject: RE: [RT] Minimum price increment> > 
  >   Ira, thanks for the explanation.> 
  >   I'm asking because I'm developing a system to remain on 
  the insidebid / offer.  I want to ensure that if I raise / lower the 
  bid / offerthat I do so in such a way the honors the minm price increment 
  rules.> >   Regards,>   
  Brendan>     -----Original 
  Message----->     From: Ira 
  [mailto:mr.ira@xxxx]>     Sent: Thursday, June 12, 
  2003 9:10 AM>     To: 
  realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>     Subject: Re: [RT] 
  Minimum price increment> > >     The 
  minimum bid is for market makers standing in the crowd andhas nothing to 
  do with you, other then the increments of bid andoffer.  There is 
  also a maximum spread between bid and offer that canbe made in the 
  crowd.  If the bid is $3 then the minimum offer in thecrowd, by a 
  market maker is $3 and $3.10.  That doesn't stop you fromputting in 
  an offer or bid at $3.00 or $3.10. If you put in your offerat $3.10 you 
  are competing with market makers and floor brokers thatare holding 
  offers.  It used to be, that if you tell your broker thatyou want 
  your offer in the book, that book orders were filled beforefloor orders 
  and they were filled in the order booked.  What if thebid/offer in 
  the crowd was $3.00 at $3.50?  You can put a bid or offeranywhere in 
  the middle in $.10 increments.  Whether you would getfilled or not is 
  another matter, but if your offer was at $3.30 itcould read $3.00 at $3.30 
  or a market maker could rest upon your offerand offer at $3.20 knowing 
  that your offer was there if the price ofthe underlying starts to 
  rise.  When you cancel your offer the marketmight very well go back 
  to $3.00 at $3.50.  Your offer was the marketmakers stop loss. 
  > >         Yahoo! 
  Groups Sponsor >        
  >        > 
  >   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:>   realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
  > > >   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
  the Yahoo! Terms of Service.To 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor












To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.