Re: [RT] SM and Hurst on Weekly DOW

["Norman Winski" <nwinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  >From: 
  <A title=hbernst963@xxxxxxx 
  href="">hbernst963@xxxxxxx 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; <A 
  title=swingmachine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="">swingmachine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 7:02 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [RT] SM and Hurst on Weekly 
  DOW
  
  <FONT lang=0  
  face=Arial size=3 FAMILY="SANSSERIF">I would look at the 78 week cycle as 
  being dominant.  Came in last week, prior date - 9-21-01, prior date - 
  3-00 top, prior date - 10-98 low.  As Casey Stengel said: "You could look 
  it up"Howard Bernstein <FONT 
  face=arial,helvetica>
<BLOCKQUOTE 
>
  Howard,
   
    78 weeks from Sept. 21, 2001 = March 18, 
  2003.  How about 77 weeks or aspects to Neptune?
   
  Regards,
   
  Norman
   
   
  <FONT 
  face=Arial>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<A 
  href=""><FONT 
  face=Arial>realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<FONT 
  face=Arial>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="">Yahoo! Terms of 
  Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


  ADVERTISEMENT









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.