|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Kent,
There is one rub to your Chinese theory. Much of the Chinese growth is
based on free market capitalistic principles. A free economy will lead to
demands for a free and democratic form of government. This may take 100
years for 1.2 billion people to become literate and affluent enough to rule
themselves. However, when it does occur, China will over take the US.
Raymond Wheeler's 510 year cycle for hemispheric rule is completed for the
West and now its time for the East to rise and dominate the world. The last
great hurrah for the US will be 2016 - 2076. These cycle patterns and
current demographic patterns dictate that you instruct your children to
learn Spanish and your grandchildren to learn Chinese.
Regards,
Norman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 4:11 AM
Subject: [RT] Humor, a little more reality for ya
> >The Saudi's have always been in our pocket, now we've got
> >Afghanistan, next we'll own Iraq. And if we somehow succeed in
>
> How much oil does Afghaistan have? I suspect that if it had any oil, Bin
> Laden would have done things a little differently.
>
> >Don't you
> >get it yet? Its their oil, and we want it.
>
> Don't you get it? It's their terrorism that we don't want. Taliban:
gone.
> Al Qaeda: home base mostly squashed. Bin Laden: on the run. US
> Constitution: in great peril from US Congress.
>
> One real danger is the Chinese picking up the terror thing and running
with
> it. There are several papers written by Chinese generals in recent years
on
> "asymmetric warfare" aka terrorism. The thing is, nothing gets people
fired
> up like religion (well there's drugs but stoned, paranoid terrorists
> wouldn't make it thru customs) and the Chinese don't really like religion
so
> they're kind of up a tree on that one (and there's freedom but the godless
> Commies don't really like that either). But if they could figure out a
way
> to keep bad guys motivated against the US, I don't doubt that they would
try
> it.
>
> But of course, I think the Chinese know that with their population, all
they
> have to do is sit back and let their economy grow. In the long run, time
is
> on their side.
>
> Kent
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <bruce.larson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:20 AM
> Subject: [RT] Re: Humor, a little song for ya
>
>
> Well, its the Frogs, the Krauts and the Russkies that are now doing
> everything in their power to stall this war. But what does Saddam
> have to do with terrorists? I posted this here well over a year ago,
> but given the mutual antagonism between Saddam (Ba'athe socialist)
> and Bin Laden (ultra orthodox Sunni), there's no way in hell they're
> bedfellows. Our administration is pulling the wool over our
> collective eyes by making all Muslims out to be badguys. Don't you
> get it yet? Its their oil, and we want it. Just look at an atlas.
> The Saudi's have always been in our pocket, now we've got
> Afghanistan, next we'll own Iraq. And if we somehow succeed in
> bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq, those Iranians (who consider
> themselves Caucasian) will surely start rioting and demand similar
> freedoms. How can you expect the Frogs, Krauts and Russkies to just
> sit idly by while we milk this region dry so we can drive our SUV's?
> Boy, If I lived in the Middle East, I'd be pissed off at Americans
> too.
>
> --- In realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "dom1_1998 <dominick@xxxx>"
> <dominick@xxxx> wrote:
> > I'm dumbfounded that people just don't get it. When terrorist came
> on
> > our soil and killed a couple of thousand of our citizens plus
> cripple
> > our economy, the United States of America DECLARED WAR on ALL
> > terrorist and ANY country that supports them, period!
> >
> > Right now it's Iraq, next Korea and so on it will be until no
> leaders
> > of any country wants them for fear of reprisal. These wars from now
> > on will be fought completely different then traditional combat.
> First
> > strike is a must for the best defense is a good offense.
> >
> > What if you had one neighbor who hated your guts and cannot be
> > reasoned with, who wants to buy some home made incendiary bombs from
> > another one of your neighbors to burn you and your house down? Wait
> > for him to strike first? Move away? I doubt it. You have no
> choice
> > but to take them both out.
> >
> > No person in their right mind wants war. But as long as there are
> > forces of good and evil, we will always have a war.
> >
> > God Bless America,
> >
> > Dominick
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|