[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[4]: [RT] RE: Barrons Economic Beat



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links


Hi:
I hate politics, but I couldn't help myself.
I just copied your paragraph and replaced the names.  It's a word game -
just like politics - - I mean, Scrabble.
;>)
And. . .
 Many pundits claim G. Bush Jr. would not have
> beaten Al Gore in '00 if it were not for the "independents" joining
> the Green Party and voting for Ralph Nader.
karen

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Johnson" <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "wavemechanic" <wd78@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 6:40 PM
Subject: Re[4]: [RT] RE: Barrons Economic Beat


> Hello wavemechanic,
>
 Many pundits claim Bill Clinton would not have
> beaten G Bush Sr in '92 if it were not for the "independdents" leaving
> Republican ranks and voting for Perot.
>
>
> Best regards,
>  Jim Johnson                           mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> Sunday, November 10, 2002, 6:25:13 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> w>   ----- Original Message -----
> w>   From: Jim Johnson
> w>   To: Bob Heisler
> w>   Cc: realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> w>   Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 5:03 PM
> w>   Subject: Re[2]: [RT] RE: Barrons Economic Beat
>
>
> w>   Hello Bob,
>
> w>   you're quite right, Bob and is something that's been rolling around
in
> w>   my mind for the last week or so.  The libertarian view is getting
> w>   increasing attention and voters it seems.  there's a lot there to be
> w>   recommended.  as the self-appointed chief strategist of the GOP I
have
> w>   been looking for a way head off a severe weakening of the
conservative
> w>   cause by libertarian success.
>
> w>   There was a recent blurb on PBS that said Independent was the fastest
growing "party."  Do you know if growth is primarily from at the expense of
one party or the other?
>
> w>   the answer as I see it is for the GOP to move toward its libertarian
> w>   roots but that will not be easy.  It breaks my heart to see how much
W
> w>   violates conservative principles--see for example
> w>   http://libertyvault.com/gwb.html.
>
> w>   Ag and steel subsidies are a couple of the most extreme cases. This
is
> w>   welfare pure and simple.
>
>
> w>   Best regards,
> w>    Jim Johnson                           mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> w>   --
> w>   Sunday, November 10, 2002, 4:07:17 PM, you wrote:
>
> w>   BH> Plus in the most recent elections all that vote for an "L" did
was elect more of the worst of the two evils.
>
>
> w>   BH> ----- Original Message -----
> w>   BH> From: "dom1_1998" <dominick@xxxxxxx>
> w>   BH> To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> w>   BH> Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 1:11 PM
> w>   BH> Subject: [RT] RE: Barrons Economic Beat
>
>
> w>   >> Hi Norm:
> w>   >>
> w>   >> Although I agree with a lot of Libertarian issues, the legal use
of
> w>   >> drugs turns me off.
> w>   >>
> w>   >> Dominick
> w>   >>
> w>   >>
> w>   >> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> w>   >> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> w>   >>
> w>   >>
> w>   >>
> w>   >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> w>   >>
> w>   >>
> w>   >>
>
>
> w>   To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> w>   realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> w>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/