[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links




A small correction:  The Senate and House 
where controlled by the Republicans when W took office and the tax cut was 
passed.  Jeffers of Vermont switched to the Democrats just after, giving 
them control of the Senate since.
 
Good luck and good trading,
 
Ray Raffurty
<BLOCKQUOTE 
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  <DIV 
  style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: 
  Kent 
  Rollins 
  To: <A title=realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  href="mailto:realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  
  Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:43 
  PM
  Subject: Re: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, 
  more to go....
  Exactly what is so bad about W's economic team?  I 
  would like to hear somespecifics from Simms and Johnson.  
  Specifics.They got a massive tax cut though a Democratic Senate and 
  they are workingto make them permanent and enact some more.  They are 
  working to privatizeSocialist Security.  They are working to expand 
  free trade.Those are positives.  What are the 
  negatives?Kent----- Original Message -----From: "Jim 
  Johnson" <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: "M. Simms" 
  <prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Cc: 
  <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:29 
  PMSubject: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....Hello 
  M.,I do agree with you that W's domestic team, esp the econ team, is 
  weakand ineffectual. I hope he cleans house for the good of the US and 
  hisadministration.  But your assessment of there pressure on W is 
  wishfulthinking.  He is bullet proof for longer than 6 months.  
  The Pittresignation would have had more political advantage for Bush had 
  itbeen done the <day before> the election.  It would have shown 
  W to beconcerned about corp corruption and all that blather the libs 
  spout.In my opinion W is perfectly situated for re-election.  
  Market hasdeclined in first two years, rates get slashed.  year 3 of 
  electioncycle clicks in soon, maybe already.  market rallies into 
  Nov, 04.Dem's will put Pelosi in as minority leader.   she will 
  embarrass theDem's every day.  Gray Davis will be a persona non grata 
  by Nov, 04and W will attempt to retake California.  Dem's are already 
  switchingparties in the Georgia house. This looks to me like a replay 
  ofReagan's reign--tax cuts, economy pops, deficit that doesn't 
  reallymatterW's vulnerability is that the economy is so broken it 
  won't respondnormally or there's another terror incident that can be 
  traced tomissteps of his administration.that's my wishful thinking 
  :)Best regards,Jim 
  Johnson                           
  mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxxTo 
  unsubscribe from this group, send an email 
  to:realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYour 
  use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <A 
  href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/";>Yahoo! Terms of Service. 







Yahoo! Groups Sponsor


<font face=arial
size=-2>ADVERTISEMENT<img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/N879.ameritrade.yahoo/B1054521.11;sz=300x250;adc=ZHS;ord=1036894357?"; alt="" width="300" height="250"
border="0">









To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.