[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

Maybe, but I would like the choice.

Kent


----- Original Message -----
From: "ira" <mr.ira@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:28 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....


Privatizing Social Security would be a disaster.  I don't want some slick
Enron or Anderson type exec. handling anything I could depend on.  The
government is bad, but most privately run agencies are a disaster.  With
luck Social Security could be lucky like Amtrac
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Rollins" <kentr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....


> Exactly what is so bad about W's economic team?  I would like to hear some
> specifics from Simms and Johnson.  Specifics.
>
> They got a massive tax cut though a Democratic Senate and they are working
> to make them permanent and enact some more.  They are working to privatize
> Socialist Security.  They are working to expand free trade.
>
> Those are positives.  What are the negatives?
>
> Kent
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Johnson" <jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "M. Simms" <prosys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:29 PM
> Subject: Re[2]: [RT] One dummy down, more to go....
>
>
> Hello M.,
>
> I do agree with you that W's domestic team, esp the econ team, is weak
> and ineffectual. I hope he cleans house for the good of the US and his
> administration.  But your assessment of there pressure on W is wishful
> thinking.  He is bullet proof for longer than 6 months.  The Pitt
> resignation would have had more political advantage for Bush had it
> been done the <day before> the election.  It would have shown W to be
> concerned about corp corruption and all that blather the libs spout.
>
> In my opinion W is perfectly situated for re-election.  Market has
> declined in first two years, rates get slashed.  year 3 of election
> cycle clicks in soon, maybe already.  market rallies into Nov, 04.
> Dem's will put Pelosi in as minority leader.   she will embarrass the
> Dem's every day.  Gray Davis will be a persona non grata by Nov, 04
> and W will attempt to retake California.  Dem's are already switching
> parties in the Georgia house. This looks to me like a replay of
> Reagan's reign--tax cuts, economy pops, deficit that doesn't really
> matter
>
> W's vulnerability is that the economy is so broken it won't respond
> normally or there's another terror incident that can be traced to
> missteps of his administration.
>
> that's my wishful thinking :)
>
>
> Best regards,
>  Jim Johnson                           mailto:jejohn@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/