|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Is 256MB enough for XP? Im thinking of upgrading too...
Regards
DanG
Hinton Clabaugh wrote:
>
> I second that, and would advise XP over W2K. It is as stable, but is easier
> to setup and maintain. I have not seen one blue screen in almost a year of
> using XP on two heavily used computers.
>
> > Yes, upgrade to W2K or XP. Windows 98 has horrible memory management.
> > And now that you have 384MB, W2K and XP will run fine.
> >
> > Kent
>
> > > Using windows 98 have always had memory management problems frequently
> operating on the cusp of locking up with more than 90% of resources used...
> always in the 19--37% range with one program
> > > running but with virus...and firewall always running.
> > > I have increased Ram to 384 with now apparent change in behavior. I
> assume it is Win 98 "s poor memory management, Is the answer win 2000 or is
> there a swap file tweak that is worth trying
> > > Memory is not the answer, but 2000/XP could be, as well as shutting
> down unnecessary programs. Here is a reference that I found a longtime ago
> (http://www2.whidbey.net/djdenham/index.htm) that
> > > you might find helpful.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Sell a Home for Top $
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RrPZMC/jTmEAA/MVfIAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|