Re: [RT] Head and Shoulders...one more time..

[STUART AUSLANkkk <u.stuart-auslander@xxxxxxx>]

I don't think the definition used in the article adequately defines a H & S
pattern.  The missing factors are volume.  Without it the pattern is
meaningless.

"M. Simms" wrote:

> http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/p27221.asp?special=msn
>
> ole Vick debunks Murphy and other pattern prognosticators.
>
> Based on H&S, Nasdaq going negative ? that's a good one !
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/NsdPZD/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/