|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
Dear Dan,
Good point! Of note to me though is that 3 of the 7 half hour figures
were higher than the previous day. Also the previous day total for
those hours were 856 million. That too was an up day.
I agree it is a close call and time will tell.
Sincerely,
John
------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
Originally From: Daniel Goncharoff <thegonch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RT] NYSE and Nas Volume for 7/5/02
Date: 07/07/2002 01:41pm
One of the features available from Barrons is half-hourly volume:
NYSE Half-Hourly Volume
Daily Jul. 1 2 3 4 5
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
9:30-10:00 150,760 163,010 158,080 .... 131,810
10:00-10:30 116,281 194,780 61,535 .... 110,100
10:30-11:00 99,339 148,750 205,725 .... 92,240
11:00-11:30 87,555 139,831 40,116 .... 77,822
11:30-12:00 85,055 130,059 211,424 .... 77,338
12:00-12:30 86,618 129,194 18,698 .... 76,063
12:30-1:00 73,632 99,296 163,522 .... 126,957
1:00-1:30 80,696 96,449 11,808 .... ….
1:30-2:00 76,174 116,361 143,672 .... ….
2:00-2:30 81,318 112,808 57,779 .... ….
2:30-3:00 98,822 117,912 145,701 .... ….
3:00-3:30 124,774 123,521 119,084 .... ….
3:30-4:00 261,422 245,722 198,399 .... ….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
One can clearly see that volumes were consistently less the previous
few
days.
Furthermore, if you consider how volume normally rises toward the
close,
Friday's close had about half the normal closing volume.
This is why I am waiting to see what the market does when a full
complement of traders is in action.
Regards
DanG
John Cappello wrote:
>
> The question of the volume significance of the Fri. rally came up.
> One needs to be a Barrons On Line or Newstand pickup to have that
> info today from them.
>
> So I went to Reuters and found out the following:
>
> 1. NYSE Volume was 710 million
>
> 2. Nas Volume was 1.1 billion
>
> Allow for the 3 hour shorter time frame as reported by Reuters, one
> can extrapolate that the daily volume would have at least equalled
or
> exceeded average daily volume for 2002.
>
> So the statement that the rally was on light volume needs to be
> placed in its proper perspective. In reality the volume may have
been
> typical for the time frame in 2002.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-
->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ztNCyD/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ztNCyD/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|