|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
thanks so much
great day
Ben
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Goncharoff" <thegonch@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [RT] NYSE and Nas Volume for 7/5/02
> One of the features available from Barrons is half-hourly volume:
>
> NYSE Half-Hourly Volume
> Daily Jul. 1 2 3 4 5
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> 9:30-10:00 150,760 163,010 158,080 .... 131,810
> 10:00-10:30 116,281 194,780 61,535 .... 110,100
> 10:30-11:00 99,339 148,750 205,725 .... 92,240
> 11:00-11:30 87,555 139,831 40,116 .... 77,822
> 11:30-12:00 85,055 130,059 211,424 .... 77,338
> 12:00-12:30 86,618 129,194 18,698 .... 76,063
> 12:30-1:00 73,632 99,296 163,522 .... 126,957
> 1:00-1:30 80,696 96,449 11,808 .... ….
> 1:30-2:00 76,174 116,361 143,672 .... ….
> 2:00-2:30 81,318 112,808 57,779 .... ….
> 2:30-3:00 98,822 117,912 145,701 .... ….
> 3:00-3:30 124,774 123,521 119,084 .... ….
> 3:30-4:00 261,422 245,722 198,399 .... ….
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> One can clearly see that volumes were consistently less the previous few
> days.
>
> Furthermore, if you consider how volume normally rises toward the close,
> Friday's close had about half the normal closing volume.
>
> This is why I am waiting to see what the market does when a full
> complement of traders is in action.
>
> Regards
> DanG
>
> John Cappello wrote:
> >
> > The question of the volume significance of the Fri. rally came up.
> > One needs to be a Barrons On Line or Newstand pickup to have that
> > info today from them.
> >
> > So I went to Reuters and found out the following:
> >
> > 1. NYSE Volume was 710 million
> >
> > 2. Nas Volume was 1.1 billion
> >
> > Allow for the 3 hour shorter time frame as reported by Reuters, one
> > can extrapolate that the daily volume would have at least equalled or
> > exceeded average daily volume for 2002.
> >
> > So the statement that the rally was on light volume needs to be
> > placed in its proper perspective. In reality the volume may have been
> > typical for the time frame in 2002.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ztNCyD/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|