|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "reinar2020" <reinar2020@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <realtraders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 3:16 AM
Subject: [RT] Re: Questions
> Norm
> Just got a great book on intro to sailing ....lots of pictures
> so I now have a table with various types of wind strength
> and I can always tell em that I'm using a spinaker goin downwind.
>
> R,
Keep your head low just in case of a quick change in the wind. They
don't call it a "boom" for nothing.
Cheers,
N
>
>
> --- In realtraders@xxxx, "Norman Winski" <nwinski@xxxx> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "reinar2020" <reinar2020@xxxx>
> > To: <realtraders@xxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 12:52 AM
> > Subject: [RT] Re: Questions
> >
> >
> > > John
> > > Thats why I said substantial northerly winds...in my notes i
> wrote
> >
> > Reinar,
> >
> > Doesn't a notherly wind mean a wind FROM the north? If you
> know
> > anything about sailing you know that you would never and couldn't
> sail
> > directly into the direction of the wind. The greatest speed would
> be on a
> > "near reach" that is when the sail is pulled in tight to a 45
> degree angle
> > to the wind. So, on a notherly wind, you could go NNE or NNW in
> addition to
> > about any direction except directly North. So what does your
> sailing
> > metaphor mean for the market? Does this mean you didn't think the
> market
> > would go up strongly ala the boat is headed straight North? The
> only thing
> > that is clear to me is that the boat won't be going North, which
> translated
> > to the market you say is up. Please elaborate.
> >
> > Are you on Mission Bay? Nice spot to sail. Been to Fidel's
> lately?
> >
> > Nautically,
> >
> > Norman
> >
> > > 984 but I did not know for sure that the next day it would sail
> > > through it and get near my 992 sand bar.
> > >
> > > I have found that when forecasting if you are a hair off one time
> > > people will rub it in your face at some point....It sucks.... So
> I
> > > do the substantial north or something else that gets the general
> > > idea across. In the email group I sometimes post the markers and
> > > sand bars
> > >
> > > What I am doing is combining various technologies.
> > > 1) The specialist stuff
> > > 2) Sand Bars (different types of support and resistance lines)
> > > 3) Markers ( probable pivot points )
> > >
> > > While I enjoy chatting with many traders I find that there are a
> > > large number of rather strange people in the trading world. I
> look
> > > at what happened to someone who lives close by...Larry Williams.
> He
> > > turned 10K in to 1 Mill in less than a year and got to spend 2
> Mill
> > > in agravation and legal fees because of it.
> > >
> > > Living in San Diego I get to hang out on the Bay and I like it.
> > > The people are great and they have a lighter attitude about
> things.
> > > Oh my name.....in the phone book it says Reinard Ron Jaenisch.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > R
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, John Cappello <jvc689@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > Dear Ron, Reinar or whatever name you prefer,
> > > >
> > > > I wish to correct an error not related to your current post
> but to
> > > my
> > > > post of so many TA people showing bearish indicaters.
> > > >
> > > > I reviewed my records and found that Ron Jaerish's Predictive
> site
> > > > did note an up market for July 5 with the euphemism of "strong
> > > > northerly winds" to the next marker. That is as close as I can
> > > recall
> > > > and as good as saying a jump from S&P 953 to 993? The
> prediction
> > > was
> > > > made on 7/3/02.
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely,
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
> > > > Originally From: "reinar2020" <reinar2020@xxxx>
> > > > Subject: [RT] Re: Questions
> > > > Date: 07/07/2002 03:45am
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > How can pitchforks be reliable when they are so dependent upon
> the
> > > > eye and perception?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes john there is a computer program that is not for sale
> > > yet...soon
> > > > but not yet....that picks pivots according to the ways Alan
> Hall
> > > > Andrews specified so that the lines are drawn from the right
> > > points.
> > > >
> > > > Lots of signals have been built for it that pick out various
> > > > patterns and other things that Andrews liked to see. Several
> years
> > > > ago there was an article in the OCT issue of S&C
> magazine...that I
> > > > wrote... that talked about trading mechanically by entering
> near a
> > > > pivot #2 with the major trend..........so you count an abc or
> an
> > > > abcde and then look for prices to zoom the ml at the pivot 1
> and
> > > > then return to the ml or the 2p or the h ....and enter there
> for
> > > > starters....
> > > >
> > > > This can be put into the program in 20 seconds or less.
> > > >
> > > > John I went through a lot of very smart people to get the pivot
> > > > formula programed and most are easy to spot but it's those few
> > > that
> > > > have a subtle but consistent difference that are important to
> > > > overall profitability. The guy that finally did it for me was a
> > > PHD
> > > > in theoritical physics. .....leave it to say it was not easy.
> > > >
> > > > The real pivot formula is somewhat complicated and not the ones
> > > you
> > > > see in the posts.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > R
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In realtraders@xxxx, John Cappello <jvc689@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. What makes anyone think that a rally as significant as
> Fri.
> > > was
> > > > > just short covering?
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. What makes anyone think that Hurst Channels will be
> anything
> > > > more
> > > > > than just another indicater given the amount of work put
> into it.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3. Why should Norm offer more sound advice than he already
> does
> > > at
> > > > no
> > > > > charge?
> > > > >
> > > > > 4. Why were most TA people pointing their indicaters down on
> > > Fri.?
> > > > >
> > > > > 5. Why do people seem to think that the ability to program
> > > > correlates
> > > > > with coming up with sound ideas that are useful for real time
> > > > trading?
> > > > >
> > > > > 6. How can pitchforks be reliable when they are so dependent
> > > upon
> > > > the
> > > > > eye and perception?
> > > > >
> > > > > These are just a few questions I have had after seeing so
> many
> > > > posts
> > > > > on these subjects.They are meant for educational purposes of
> > > > myself
> > > > > and perhaps others. I have more, but they can wait.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ----------------
> ----
> > > -~-
> > > > ->
> > > > Will You Find True Love?
> > > > Will You Meet the One?
> > > > Free Love Reading by phone!
> > > > http://us.click.yahoo.com/ztNCyD/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> > > --
> > > > ~->
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Pp91HA/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|