[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RT] Re: Questions



PureBytes Links

Trading Reference Links

John
Thats why I said substantial northerly winds...in my notes i wrote 
984 but I did not know for sure that the next day it would sail 
through it and get near my 992 sand bar.

I have found that when forecasting if you are a hair off one time 
people will rub it in your face at some point....It sucks.... So I 
do the substantial north or something else that gets the general 
idea across. In the email group I sometimes post the markers and 
sand bars 

What I am doing is combining various technologies.
1) The specialist stuff
2) Sand Bars (different types of support and resistance lines)
3) Markers ( probable pivot points )

While I enjoy chatting with many traders I find that there are a 
large number of rather strange people in the trading world. I look 
at what happened to someone who lives close by...Larry Williams. He 
turned 10K in to 1 Mill in less than a year and got to spend 2 Mill 
in agravation and legal fees because of it. 

Living in San Diego I get to hang out on the Bay and I like it.
The people are great and they have a lighter attitude about things.
Oh my name.....in the phone book it says Reinard Ron Jaenisch.

Regards
R




--- In realtraders@xxxx, John Cappello <jvc689@xxxx> wrote:
> Dear Ron, Reinar or whatever name you prefer,
> 
> I wish to correct an error not related to your current post but to 
my 
> post of so many TA people showing bearish indicaters. 
> 
> I reviewed my records and found that Ron Jaerish's Predictive site 
> did note an up market for July 5 with the euphemism of "strong 
> northerly winds" to the next marker. That is as close as I can 
recall 
> and as good as saying a jump from S&P 953 to 993? The prediction 
was 
> made on 7/3/02.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
> Originally From: "reinar2020" <reinar2020@xxxx>
> Subject: [RT] Re: Questions
> Date: 07/07/2002 03:45am
> 
> 
> 
> How can pitchforks be reliable when they are so dependent upon the 
> eye and perception? 
> 
> 
> 
> Yes john there is a computer program that is not for sale 
yet...soon 
> but not yet....that picks pivots according to the ways Alan Hall 
> Andrews specified so that the lines are drawn from the right 
points.
> 
> Lots of signals have been built for it that pick out various 
> patterns and other things that Andrews liked to see. Several years 
> ago there was an article in the OCT issue of S&C magazine...that I 
> wrote... that talked about trading mechanically by entering near a 
> pivot #2 with the major trend..........so you count an abc or an 
> abcde and then look for prices to zoom the ml at the pivot 1 and 
> then return to the ml or the 2p or the h ....and enter there for 
> starters....
> 
> This can be put into the program in 20 seconds or less. 
> 
> John I went through a lot of very smart people to get the pivot 
> formula programed and most are easy to spot but it's those few 
that  
> have a subtle but consistent difference that are important to 
> overall profitability. The guy that finally did it for me was a 
PHD 
> in theoritical physics. .....leave it to say it was not easy.
> 
> The real pivot formula is somewhat complicated and not the ones 
you 
> see in the posts.
> 
> Regards
> R
> 
> 
> 
> --- In realtraders@xxxx, John Cappello <jvc689@xxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > 1. What makes anyone think that a rally as significant as Fri. 
was 
> > just short covering?
> > 
> > 2. What makes anyone think that Hurst Channels will be anything 
> more 
> > than just another indicater given the amount of work put into it.
> > 
> > 3. Why should Norm offer more sound advice than he already does 
at 
> no 
> > charge?
> > 
> > 4. Why were most TA people pointing their indicaters down on 
Fri.?
> > 
> > 5. Why do people seem to think that the ability to program 
> correlates 
> > with coming up with sound ideas that are useful for real time 
> trading?
> > 
> > 6. How can pitchforks be reliable when they are so dependent 
upon 
> the 
> > eye and perception?
> > 
> > These are just a few questions I have had after seeing so many 
> posts 
> > on these subjects.They are meant for educational purposes of 
> myself 
> > and perhaps others. I have more, but they can wait.
> > 
> > John
> 
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
-~-
> ->
> Will You Find True Love?
> Will You Meet the One?
> Free Love Reading by phone!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/ztNCyD/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ~->
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxx
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/ztNCyD/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/