|
PureBytes Links
Trading Reference Links
|
FWIW, my SGS gave low pivot volatility reversal alerts for the SPX and
the SnP.
Regards
Ned
www.epcalc.netfirms.com
--- In realtraders@xxxx, profitok <profitok@xxxx> wrote:
> My most reliable indicator turn up for NASDAQ
> but NOT for sp500
> Ben
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bondo92677" <bruce.larson@xxxx>
> To: <gannsghost@xxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:02 AM
> Subject: [gannsghost] 5/22/2002 is the next Turning Point for the
QQQ/[RT]
> Re: qqq/ To Ben and Lee Morris
>
>
> > So much for 5/22.
> > Actually tomorrow may work out better as a low.
> > 1/7/02+71=3/19/02+71=5/29/02
> > 1/14/00+433=3/22/01+433=5/29/02
> >
> > NDX 1222 is both a minor sqof9 and fibo retrace level, same with
SPX
> > 1071.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In gannsghost@xxxx, "bondo92677" <bruce.larson@xxxx> wrote:
> > > I'd much rather see the low on 5/28. Mars ingress, opp
6/21/01SE
> > and
> > > 911, Jupiter return to 11/1/01. Nice geometry on the Dow on
that
> > > date as well.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In gannsghost@xxxx, "gann_trader_19" <H.Albizem@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > Hello Pete,
> > > >
> > > > I have covered my short around 12:15 pm today and took long
> > > position.
> > > >
> > > > I have given the "significant" bottom in message# 4293 dated
> > > 5/2/2002
> > > > (WITS) where I said "significant" Bottom will be between
5/5/2002
> > > to
> > > > 5/8//2002(and it did..)..there is IMPORTANT reason WHY I was
NOT
> > > > specific to ONE day..I will try to explain it this weekend
> > without
> > > > exposing my system. I told the group to take my word for it
and
> > > > let "time prove all things".
> > > >
> > > > I have said in my message # 12171 in GG that 5/22/2002..I
stand
> > for
> > > > this and I am acting accordingly..I can not tell you what you
do
> > > but
> > > > I am telling what I have just done.
> > > >
> > > > All my above comments are for QQQ/Nasdaq, regarding DOW I have
to
> > > do
> > > > more calculations(which I really don't have a motive to do it
> > since
> > > I
> > > > don't trade DOW) but in "general" DOW may behave like Nasdaq
and
> > > may
> > > > turn with QQQ UP.
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes,
> > > >
> > > > Haytham
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In gannsghost@xxxx, "dowsp" <dowsp@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Hello Haytham,
> > > > >
> > > > > In my last msg to you, the market did almost as I had
commented
> > > on.
> > > > >
> > > > > I had a GOOD cycle date on the 17th/20th.
> > > > > Yesterday / today we now have the low your looking for.
> > > > >
> > > > > CAN YOU PLEASE tell me IF you NOW see a RALLY TO NEW YEAR
HIGHS
> > > or
> > > > > just a pull back between 10673 - 10100, followed by further
> > > > downside.
> > > > >
> > > > > 10100 has found support on a good trendline from 9800 two
> > weeks
> > > > ago.
> > > > > This to me has a chance of turning the mkt to 10210/30
> > > > >
> > > > > If this breaks , Maybe new highs could come in.
> > > > >
> > > > > Just trying to find why you dont see the 17th as a good CIT
> > date.
> > > > >
> > > > > Comments welcome from other members.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pete
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In gannsghost@xxxx, "dowsp" <dowsp@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > I am asking Haytham not your opinion Thank you
> > > > > > so unless you have anything positive to add please dont
> > comment
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Waiting till the 22nds no good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PN
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In gannsghost@xxxx, profitok <profitok@xxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > read his lips
> > > > > > > he is NOT going to reply until 5/22
> > > > > > > please LEAVE the gentleman alone
> > > > > > > best regards and good trading
> > > > > > > Ben
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "dowsp" <dowsp@xxxx>
> > > > > > > To: <gannsghost@xxxx>
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 4:24 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: [gannsghost] 5/22/2002 is the next Turning
Point
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > QQQ/[RT]
> > > > > > > Re: qqq/ To Ben and Lee Morris
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Haytham,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Dows made a 62% retrace of the 10673 - 9800 range
> > since
> > > > > your
> > > > > > call.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I see a top if not already at 10350 could well occur
> > > between
> > > > > the
> > > > > > 17th
> > > > > > > > and 21st.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So if it does and goes down to the 22nd what do you
see
> > > from
> > > > > > there.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > DO YOU THEN SEE A MAIN RALLY INSTEAD OF A MAJOR MKT
> > DECLINE
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > or another small move up . IF so well it get above
10350
> > or
> > > > > > another
> > > > > > > > high between 10380 to 10500 which I am expecting.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please clear this up.
> > > > > > > > Pete
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In gannsghost@xxxx, "gann_trader_19"
<H.Albizem@xxxx>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > REGRADLESS 5/7/2002 LOW IS TAKEN OUT OR NOT
"5/22/2002
> > > MUST
> > > > BE
> > > > > > > > LOW".
> > > > > > > > > I am not going to reply to any email until
5/22/2002.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Haytham
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > > > > gannsghost-unsubscribe@xxxx
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > gannsghost-unsubscribe@xxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FREE COLLEGE MONEY
CLICK HERE to search
600,000 scholarships!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/DlIU9C/4m7CAA/Ey.GAA/zMEolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
realtraders-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|